APLE vs. SCHG
APLE (Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.) is a stock, while SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Over the past 10 years, APLE returned 4.49%/yr vs 18.65%/yr for SCHG. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
APLE vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APLE achieves a 44.57% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 1.35% return. Over the past 10 years, APLE has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 4.49%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.65% annualized return.
APLE
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 15.34%
- YTD
- 44.57%
- 6M
- 44.69%
- 1Y
- 53.03%
- 3Y*
- 12.71%
- 5Y*
- 7.27%
- 10Y*
- 4.49%
SCHG
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- -3.93%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 17.91%
- 3Y*
- 22.13%
- 5Y*
- 13.27%
- 10Y*
- 18.65%
APLE vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APLE Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. | 44.57% | -16.61% | -1.26% | 12.31% | 2.41% | 25.42% | -18.91% | 21.97% | -21.64% | 3.99% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 1.35% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between APLE and SCHG is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2015 | 0.40 |
The correlation between APLE and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APLE vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
APLE
SCHG
APLE vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. (APLE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| APLE | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.20 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.95 | 1.10 | +2.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.15 | 3.58 | +5.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
APLE vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APLE drawdown since its inception was -71.83%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLE and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APLE | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.83% | -34.59% | -37.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.49% | -16.41% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.95% | -23.39% | -9.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.95% | -34.59% | +1.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.83% | -34.59% | -37.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -6.46% | +6.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.35% | -5.20% | -7.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.81% | 5.02% | +0.79% |
Volatility
APLE vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. (APLE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 5.66% and 5.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APLE | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.66% | 5.91% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.61% | 12.52% | +4.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.92% | 16.24% | +6.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.26% | 22.38% | +4.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.57% | 21.58% | +12.99% |
Dividends
APLE vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
APLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.78%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APLE Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. | 5.78% | 8.10% | 6.58% | 6.08% | 4.82% | 0.25% | 2.32% | 6.77% | 9.12% | 5.61% | 6.01% | 4.01% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
APLE and SCHG have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHG has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to APLE (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APLE dropped -71.83% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
APLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APLE and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer