PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APLE vs. BEDZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APLE vs. BEDZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. (APLE) and AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APLE achieves a 45.17% return, which is significantly higher than BEDZ's 11.91% return.


APLE

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.30%
6M
46.78%
YTD
45.17%
1Y
54.24%
3Y*
10.11%
5Y*
8.26%
10Y*
3.50%
ALL TIME*
4.94%

BEDZ

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.55%
6M
14.32%
YTD
11.91%
1Y
18.93%
3Y*
13.22%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$51.54M$47.76M$46.74M
$65.74K$44.95K$74.21K

APLE vs. BEDZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
APLE
Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.
45.17%-16.61%-1.26%12.31%2.41%8.89%
BEDZ
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF
11.91%3.46%18.31%23.88%-13.40%7.95%

Correlation

The correlation between APLE and BEDZ is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021

0.73

The correlation between APLE and BEDZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APLE vs. BEDZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

APLE
APLE Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
APLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
APLE Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
APLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
APLE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

BEDZ
BEDZ Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
BEDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BEDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BEDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BEDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BEDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

APLE vs. BEDZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. (APLE) and AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APLEBEDZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.15

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

1.34

+2.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.06

3.19

+5.88

APLE vs. BEDZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APLE Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the BEDZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APLE and BEDZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APLE vs. BEDZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APLE drawdown since its inception was -71.83%, which is greater than BEDZ's maximum drawdown of -29.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLE and BEDZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APLEBEDZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.83%

-29.70%

-42.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.49%

-12.06%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.95%

-28.31%

-4.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.95%

-29.70%

-3.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.81%

-2.43%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.25%

-7.89%

-4.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.68%

5.08%

+0.60%

Volatility

APLE vs. BEDZ - Volatility Comparison

Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. (APLE) and AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) have volatilities of 5.20% and 5.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APLEBEDZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.20%

5.40%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.66%

15.18%

+0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.52%

20.40%

+2.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.03%

24.60%

+2.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.56%

24.66%

+9.90%

Dividends

APLE vs. BEDZ - Dividend Comparison

APLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, more than BEDZ's 2.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APLE
Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.
5.81%8.10%6.58%6.08%4.82%0.25%2.32%6.77%9.12%5.61%6.01%4.01%
BEDZ
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF
2.06%2.31%0.00%1.67%0.21%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


APLE and BEDZ have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BEDZ has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to APLE (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APLE dropped -71.83% vs BEDZ's -29.70%.

APLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APLE and BEDZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer