CL vs. VTI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI).

VTI is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Total Market Index. It was launched on Jun 27, 2016.

Performance

CL vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CL vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company	8.52%	-10.98%	16.57%	3.78%	-5.44%	2.08%	27.17%	18.60%	-19.19%	17.88%
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF	-4.01%	17.10%	23.81%	26.05%	-19.52%	25.68%	21.08%	30.67%	-5.23%	21.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CL achieves a 8.52% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's -4.01% return. Over the past 10 years, CL has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 4.23%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 13.60% annualized return.

CL

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: -14.03%
• YTD: 8.52%
• 6M: 7.99%
• 1Y: -6.80%
• 3Y*: 6.78%
• 5Y*: 4.08%
• 10Y*: 4.23%

VTI

• 1D: 2.93%
• 1M: -5.00%
• YTD: -4.01%
• 6M: -1.66%
• 1Y: 18.11%
• 3Y*: 17.84%
• 5Y*: 10.46%
• 10Y*: 13.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CL vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CL

CL Risk / Return Rank: 29
CL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
CL Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
CL Omega Ratio Rank: 25
CL Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
CL Martin Ratio Rank: 34

VTI

VTI Risk / Return Rank: 65
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 65
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CL vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CL	VTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.32	0.96	-1.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.32	1.48	-1.81
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.23	-0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.29	1.52	-1.81
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.51	7.26	-7.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CL vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CL Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CL and VTI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CL	VTI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.32	0.96	-1.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22	0.60	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22	0.75	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.48	-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between CL and VTI is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CL vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

CL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, more than VTI's 1.17% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company	2.44%	2.61%	2.18%	2.40%	2.36%	2.10%	2.05%	2.48%	2.79%	2.11%	2.37%	2.25%
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF	1.17%	1.12%	1.27%	1.44%	1.66%	1.21%	1.42%	1.78%	2.04%	1.71%	1.92%	1.98%

Drawdowns

CL vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CL drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than VTI's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL and VTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	CL	VTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.91%	-55.45%	-3.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.74%	-12.30%	-8.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.05%	-25.36%	-3.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.05%	-35.00%	+5.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.85%	-6.25%	-12.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.22%	-8.08%	-3.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.69%	2.58%	+9.11%

Volatility

CL vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) has a higher volatility of 6.68% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 5.45%. This indicates that CL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CL	VTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.68%	5.45%	+1.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.89%	9.73%	+6.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.34%	19.01%	+2.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.30%	17.42%	+0.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.52%	18.29%	+1.23%