PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CL vs. AAPL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CLAAPL
YTD Return15.52%-11.95%
1Y Return19.70%1.07%
3Y Return (Ann)7.61%8.64%
5Y Return (Ann)7.55%28.08%
10Y Return (Ann)5.55%24.74%
Sharpe Ratio1.510.20
Daily Std Dev14.32%19.66%
Max Drawdown-67.62%-81.80%
Current Drawdown0.00%-14.43%

Fundamentals


CLAAPL
Market Cap$71.62B$2.55T
EPS$2.77$6.43
PE Ratio31.4525.66
PEG Ratio2.152.06
Revenue (TTM)$19.46B$385.71B
Gross Profit (TTM)$10.25B$170.78B
EBITDA (TTM)$4.51B$130.11B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between CL and AAPL is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CL vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CL achieves a 15.52% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's -11.95% return. Over the past 10 years, CL has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 5.55%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 24.74% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%50,000.00%100,000.00%150,000.00%200,000.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
23,374.34%
170,565.32%
CL
AAPL

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Colgate-Palmolive Company

Apple Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CL vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and Apple Inc. (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CL, currently valued at 1.51, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.51
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CL, currently valued at 2.11, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.11
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CL, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.27
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CL, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.37
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CL, currently valued at 3.33, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.33
AAPL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AAPL, currently valued at 0.20, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.20
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AAPL, currently valued at 0.42, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.42
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AAPL, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.05
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AAPL, currently valued at 0.24, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.24
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AAPL, currently valued at 0.49, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.49

CL vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CL Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CL and AAPL.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
1.51
0.20
CL
AAPL

Dividends

CL vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

CL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than AAPL's 0.57% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
2.13%2.40%2.36%2.10%2.05%2.48%2.79%2.11%2.37%2.25%2.05%2.04%
AAPL
Apple Inc.
0.57%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%1.67%2.10%

Drawdowns

CL vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CL drawdown since its inception was -67.62%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL and AAPL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril0
-14.43%
CL
AAPL

Volatility

CL vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) is 3.68%, while Apple Inc. (AAPL) has a volatility of 6.27%. This indicates that CL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
3.68%
6.27%
CL
AAPL

Financials

CL vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Colgate-Palmolive Company and Apple Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items