PortfoliosLab logo
CL vs. AAPL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CL and AAPL is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CL vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CL:

-0.07

AAPL:

0.36

Sortino Ratio

CL:

0.04

AAPL:

0.80

Omega Ratio

CL:

1.01

AAPL:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

CL:

-0.07

AAPL:

0.40

Martin Ratio

CL:

-0.12

AAPL:

1.31

Ulcer Index

CL:

11.70%

AAPL:

10.13%

Daily Std Dev

CL:

20.48%

AAPL:

32.87%

Max Drawdown

CL:

-58.90%

AAPL:

-81.80%

Current Drawdown

CL:

-14.75%

AAPL:

-18.24%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CL:

$73.93B

AAPL:

$3.16T

EPS

CL:

$3.53

AAPL:

$6.42

PE Ratio

CL:

25.84

AAPL:

32.91

PEG Ratio

CL:

1.94

AAPL:

2.14

PS Ratio

CL:

3.71

AAPL:

7.89

PB Ratio

CL:

200.10

AAPL:

47.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

CL:

$19.95B

AAPL:

$400.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CL:

$12.11B

AAPL:

$186.70B

EBITDA (TTM)

CL:

$4.82B

AAPL:

$138.87B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CL achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's -15.43% return. Over the past 10 years, CL has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 5.29%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 21.98% annualized return.


CL

YTD

1.49%

1M

-4.47%

6M

-1.39%

1Y

-0.99%

5Y*

7.88%

10Y*

5.29%

AAPL

YTD

-15.43%

1M

7.39%

6M

-5.88%

1Y

11.79%

5Y*

22.59%

10Y*

21.98%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CL vs. AAPL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CL is 4343
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CL is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CL is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CL is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CL is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CL is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AAPL is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AAPL is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AAPL is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AAPL is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AAPL is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AAPL is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CL vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CL Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CL and AAPL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CL vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

CL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, more than AAPL's 0.48% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
2.21%2.18%2.40%2.36%2.10%2.05%2.48%2.79%2.11%2.37%2.25%2.05%
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.48%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%1.67%

Drawdowns

CL vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CL drawdown since its inception was -58.90%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL and AAPL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CL vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) is 6.83%, while Apple Inc (AAPL) has a volatility of 9.68%. This indicates that CL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CL vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Colgate-Palmolive Company and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20212022202320242025
4.91B
95.36B
(CL) Total Revenue
(AAPL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CL vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Colgate-Palmolive Company and Apple Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
60.8%
47.1%
(CL) Gross Margin
(AAPL) Gross Margin
CL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a gross profit of 2.99B and revenue of 4.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.8%.

AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 44.87B and revenue of 95.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.1%.

CL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported an operating income of 1.08B and revenue of 4.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.9%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 29.59B and revenue of 95.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.0%.

CL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a net income of 690.00M and revenue of 4.91B, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Apple Inc reported a net income of 24.78B and revenue of 95.36B, resulting in a net margin of 26.0%.