PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CL vs. AAPL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CL and AAPL is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

CL vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-4.99%
21.35%
CL
AAPL

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CL:

1.34

AAPL:

1.51

Sortino Ratio

CL:

1.88

AAPL:

2.18

Omega Ratio

CL:

1.25

AAPL:

1.28

Calmar Ratio

CL:

1.22

AAPL:

2.05

Martin Ratio

CL:

3.31

AAPL:

5.34

Ulcer Index

CL:

6.12%

AAPL:

6.37%

Daily Std Dev

CL:

15.12%

AAPL:

22.59%

Max Drawdown

CL:

-58.91%

AAPL:

-81.80%

Current Drawdown

CL:

-14.63%

AAPL:

0.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CL:

$76.38B

AAPL:

$3.83T

EPS

CL:

$3.48

AAPL:

$6.08

PE Ratio

CL:

26.86

AAPL:

41.69

PEG Ratio

CL:

2.11

AAPL:

2.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

CL:

$20.11B

AAPL:

$391.04B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CL:

$12.12B

AAPL:

$180.68B

EBITDA (TTM)

CL:

$5.26B

AAPL:

$134.66B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CL achieves a 18.46% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's 34.77% return. Over the past 10 years, CL has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 5.12%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 26.16% annualized return.


CL

YTD

18.46%

1M

-2.67%

6M

-5.45%

1Y

20.29%

5Y*

8.68%

10Y*

5.12%

AAPL

YTD

34.77%

1M

12.32%

6M

23.78%

1Y

34.02%

5Y*

29.81%

10Y*

26.16%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CL vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CL, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.341.51
The chart of Sortino ratio for CL, currently valued at 1.88, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.882.18
The chart of Omega ratio for CL, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.251.28
The chart of Calmar ratio for CL, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.222.05
The chart of Martin ratio for CL, currently valued at 3.31, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.003.315.34
CL
AAPL

The current CL Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CL and AAPL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.34
1.51
CL
AAPL

Dividends

CL vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

CL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than AAPL's 0.38% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
2.14%2.40%2.36%2.10%2.05%2.48%2.79%2.11%2.37%2.25%2.05%2.04%
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.38%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%1.67%2.10%

Drawdowns

CL vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CL drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL and AAPL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-14.63%
0
CL
AAPL

Volatility

CL vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 4.02%. This indicates that CL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
4.26%
4.02%
CL
AAPL

Financials

CL vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Colgate-Palmolive Company and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab