CL vs. AAPL
CL (Colgate-Palmolive Company) and AAPL (Apple Inc) are both stocks. CL operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while AAPL operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology). Over the past 10 years, CL returned 4.71%/yr vs 28.88%/yr for AAPL. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CL vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CL achieves a 20.19% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's 14.61% return. Over the past 10 years, CL has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 4.71%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 28.88% annualized return.
CL
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 20.19%
- 1Y
- 15.11%
- 3Y*
- 9.48%
- 5Y*
- 5.97%
- 10Y*
- 4.71%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.32%
AAPL
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- 6M
- 12.69%
- YTD
- 14.61%
- 1Y
- 53.87%
- 3Y*
- 20.11%
- 5Y*
- 16.87%
- 10Y*
- 28.88%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.31%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | $20.71B | $17.73B | $17.51B |
| $490.01M | $436.82M | $466.17M |
CL vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 20.19% | -10.98% | 16.57% | 3.78% | -5.44% | 2.08% | 27.17% | 18.60% | -19.19% | 17.88% |
AAPL Apple Inc | 14.61% | 9.05% | 30.71% | 49.01% | -26.40% | 34.65% | 82.31% | 88.96% | -5.39% | 48.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between CL and AAPL is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 1980 | 0.20 |
The correlation between CL and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (3 years) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CL:
$74.64B
AAPL:
$4.57T
CL:
$2.53
AAPL:
$8.69
CL:
36.93
AAPL:
35.78
CL:
9.54
AAPL:
4.71
CL:
3.57
AAPL:
9.88
CL:
318.50
AAPL:
42.67
CL:
$21.05B
AAPL:
$466.82B
CL:
$12.72B
AAPL:
$227.12B
CL:
$3.68B
AAPL:
$168.49B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CL vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank
CL
AAPL
CL vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CL | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.38 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 3.92 | -3.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.78 | 9.19 | -7.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CL vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CL drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL and AAPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CL | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.91% | -81.80% | +22.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.97% | -13.80% | -3.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.05% | -33.36% | +4.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.05% | -33.36% | +4.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.05% | -38.52% | +9.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.12% | -8.55% | -1.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.24% | -29.51% | +18.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.50% | 5.88% | +2.62% |
Volatility
CL vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) is 7.53%, while Apple Inc (AAPL) has a volatility of 10.76%. This indicates that CL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CL | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.53% | 10.76% | -3.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.03% | 20.52% | -3.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.66% | 25.89% | -3.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.03% | 28.05% | -9.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.90% | 29.13% | -9.23% |
Dividends
CL vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison
CL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than AAPL's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.34% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 2.25% | 2.61% | 2.18% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% |
Financials
CL vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Colgate-Palmolive Company and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CL vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison
CL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a gross profit of 3.30B and revenue of 5.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.5%.
AAPL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.77B and revenue of 109.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.1%.
CL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported an operating income of 1.02B and revenue of 5.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.0%.
AAPL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.70B and revenue of 109.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.6%.
CL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a net income of 693.00M and revenue of 5.36B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.
AAPL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.79B and revenue of 109.42B, resulting in a net margin of 27.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CL and AAPL have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAPL has higher volatility (10.76%) compared to CL (7.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CL dropped -58.91% vs AAPL's -81.80%.
AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CL and AAPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer