CIFU vs. BLSG
CIFU (T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF) and BLSG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CIFU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BLSG.
Performance
CIFU vs. BLSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIFU achieves a -26.03% return, which is significantly higher than BLSG's -74.44% return.
CIFU
- 1D
- -20.66%
- 1M
- -58.62%
- 6M
- -45.17%
- YTD
- -26.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLSG
- 1D
- -13.69%
- 1M
- -24.02%
- 6M
- -73.74%
- YTD
- -74.44%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIFU vs. BLSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF | -26.03% | -13.41% |
BLSG Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF | -74.44% | 2.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIFU and BLSG is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIFU vs. BLSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIFU vs. BLSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIFU drawdown since its inception was -77.20%, smaller than the maximum BLSG drawdown of -90.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFU and BLSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIFU | BLSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.20% | -90.65% | +13.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.94% | -89.78% | +23.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.91% | -64.18% | +21.27% |
Volatility
CIFU vs. BLSG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIFU | BLSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 206.70% | 147.24% | +59.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 206.70% | 147.24% | +59.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 206.70% | 147.24% | +59.46% |
CIFU vs. BLSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIFU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BLSG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIFU vs. BLSG - Dividend Comparison
Neither CIFU nor BLSG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CIFU and BLSG have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BLSG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BLSG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CIFU.
CIFU and BLSG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CIFU and 0.75% for BLSG.
Find the right allocation for CIFU and BLSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer