CIFU vs. BLSG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CIFU (T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF) and BLSG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CIFU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BLSG.

Performance

CIFU vs. BLSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIFU achieves a 90.91% return, which is significantly higher than BLSG's -58.79% return.

CIFU

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: 94.18%
• YTD: 90.91%
• 6M: 10.06%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLSG

• 1D: -15.77%
• 1M: -55.27%
• YTD: -58.79%
• 6M: -73.27%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIFU vs. BLSG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF	90.91%	-6.67%
BLSG Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF	-58.79%	-8.87%

Correlation

The correlation between CIFU and BLSG is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025	0.49

Return for Risk

CIFU vs. BLSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CIFU	BLSG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.99	-0.66	+1.65

Drawdowns

CIFU vs. BLSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIFU drawdown since its inception was -77.20%, smaller than the maximum BLSG drawdown of -83.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFU and BLSG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIFU	BLSG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.20%	-83.67%	+6.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.09%	-83.52%	+74.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.35%	-60.12%	+14.77%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CIFU	BLSG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	206.19%	145.44%	+60.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	206.19%	145.44%	+60.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	206.19%	145.44%	+60.75%

CIFU vs. BLSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIFU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BLSG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

CIFU vs. BLSG - Dividend Comparison

Neither CIFU nor BLSG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CIFU and BLSG in my portfolio?

CIFU and BLSG have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CIFU or BLSG?

On fees, BLSG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CIFU or BLSG?

BLSG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CIFU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CIFU or BLSG?

CIFU and BLSG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CIFU and BLSG?

They also come from different issuers: REX and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CIFU and 0.75% for BLSG.