CIFU vs. UUUG
CIFU (T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF) and UUUG (Leverage Shares 2X Long UUUU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CIFU is actively managed, while UUUG is passively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CIFU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UUUG.
Performance
CIFU vs. UUUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CIFU
- 1D
- -6.69%
- 1M
- 48.67%
- YTD
- 102.64%
- 6M
- 61.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UUUG
- 1D
- -4.79%
- 1M
- -26.54%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIFU vs. UUUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF | 47.83% |
UUUG Leverage Shares 2X Long UUUU Daily ETF | -57.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIFU and UUUG is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIFU vs. UUUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long UUUU Daily ETF (UUUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIFU vs. UUUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIFU drawdown since its inception was -77.20%, smaller than the maximum UUUG drawdown of -83.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFU and UUUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIFU | UUUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.20% | -83.65% | +6.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.69% | -77.75% | +71.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.16% | -53.93% | +10.77% |
Volatility
CIFU vs. UUUG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIFU | UUUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 207.67% | 190.05% | +17.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 207.67% | 190.05% | +17.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 207.67% | 190.05% | +17.62% |
CIFU vs. UUUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIFU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than UUUG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIFU vs. UUUG - Dividend Comparison
Neither CIFU nor UUUG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CIFU and UUUG have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UUUG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UUUG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CIFU.
CIFU and UUUG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CIFU and 0.75% for UUUG.
Find the right allocation for CIFU and UUUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer