CIFU vs. BEX
CIFU (T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF) and BEX (Tradr 2X Long BE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CIFU charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for BEX.
Performance
CIFU vs. BEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CIFU
- 1D
- -3.18%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- 6M
- -2.20%
- YTD
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BEX
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -51.56%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $83.57M | $80.37M | $68.34M | |
| $5.77M | $5.53M | $5.58M |
CIFU vs. BEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF | -25.83% |
BEX Tradr 2X Long BE Daily ETF | -69.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIFU and BEX is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIFU vs. BEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU) and Tradr 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIFU vs. BEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIFU drawdown since its inception was -77.20%, smaller than the maximum BEX drawdown of -82.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFU and BEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIFU | BEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.20% | -82.16% | +4.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.45% | -72.82% | +19.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.47% | -41.43% | -2.04% |
Volatility
CIFU vs. BEX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIFU | BEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 223.23% | 264.69% | -41.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 223.23% | 264.69% | -41.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 223.23% | 264.69% | -41.46% |
CIFU vs. BEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIFU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BEX's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIFU vs. BEX - Dividend Comparison
Neither CIFU nor BEX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CIFU and BEX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BEX is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BEX is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CIFU.
CIFU and BEX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CIFU and 1.30% for BEX.
Find the right allocation for CIFU and BEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer