CIFU vs. PLUL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CIFU (T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF) and PLUL (Leverage Shares 2X Long PLUG Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CIFU is actively managed, while PLUL is passively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CIFU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PLUL.

Performance

CIFU vs. PLUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PLUG Daily ETF (PLUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CIFU

• 1D: -4.06%
• 1M: 42.63%
• YTD: 94.41%
• 6M: 64.26%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PLUL

• 1D: -6.18%
• 1M: -52.73%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIFU vs. PLUL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF	41.83%
PLUL Leverage Shares 2X Long PLUG Daily ETF	-9.75%

Correlation

The correlation between CIFU and PLUL is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026	0.55

Return for Risk

CIFU vs. PLUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PLUG Daily ETF (PLUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

CIFU vs. PLUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIFU drawdown since its inception was -77.20%, which is greater than PLUL's maximum drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFU and PLUL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIFU	PLUL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.20%	-61.04%	-16.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.48%	-60.12%	+49.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.93%	-27.01%	-15.92%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CIFU	PLUL	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	207.07%	186.73%	+20.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	207.07%	186.73%	+20.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	207.07%	186.73%	+20.34%

CIFU vs. PLUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIFU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PLUL's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

CIFU vs. PLUL - Dividend Comparison

Neither CIFU nor PLUL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CIFU and PLUL in my portfolio?

CIFU and PLUL have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CIFU or PLUL?

On fees, PLUL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CIFU or PLUL?

PLUL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CIFU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CIFU or PLUL?

CIFU and PLUL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CIFU and PLUL?

They also come from different issuers: REX and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CIFU and 0.75% for PLUL.