CIBR vs. XLE
CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) and XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CIBR is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, while XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CIBR returned 17.87%/yr vs 9.82%/yr for XLE. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CIBR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLE.
Performance
CIBR vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIBR achieves a 19.83% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 28.59% return. Over the past 10 years, CIBR has outperformed XLE with an annualized return of 17.87%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.82% annualized return.
CIBR
- 1D
- 2.67%
- 1M
- 14.20%
- YTD
- 19.83%
- 6M
- 13.32%
- 1Y
- 18.11%
- 3Y*
- 24.84%
- 5Y*
- 13.62%
- 10Y*
- 17.87%
XLE
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- YTD
- 28.59%
- 6M
- 26.16%
- 1Y
- 36.64%
- 3Y*
- 16.07%
- 5Y*
- 19.94%
- 10Y*
- 9.82%
CIBR vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 19.83% | 13.06% | 18.21% | 39.71% | -26.46% | 19.67% | 50.53% | 28.52% | 1.47% | 18.61% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 28.59% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -18.22% | -0.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIBR and XLE is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015 | 0.30 |
The correlation between CIBR and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CIBR vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CIBR
XLE
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
CIBR
XLE
-
Industrials
CIBR
XLE
-
Communication Services
CIBR
XLE
-
Basic Materials
CIBR
-
XLE
-
Consumer Cyclical
CIBR
-
XLE
-
Consumer Defensive
CIBR
-
XLE
-
Energy
CIBR
-
XLE
Financial Services
CIBR
-
XLE
-
Healthcare
CIBR
-
XLE
-
Real Estate
CIBR
-
XLE
-
Utilities
CIBR
-
XLE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIBR vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank
CIBR
XLE
CIBR vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CIBR | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.29 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | 3.05 | -2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.94 | 8.57 | -6.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIBR vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIBR drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR and XLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIBR | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.89% | -71.26% | +37.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.99% | -12.05% | -9.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.99% | -20.14% | -1.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.89% | -26.04% | -7.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.89% | -66.81% | +32.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.38% | -8.70% | -0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.66% | -17.97% | +9.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.36% | 4.29% | +5.07% |
Volatility
CIBR vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a higher volatility of 12.35% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 7.22%. This indicates that CIBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIBR | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.35% | 7.22% | +5.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.72% | 16.80% | +4.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.16% | 20.60% | +4.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.05% | 26.06% | -1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.65% | 29.58% | -5.93% |
CIBR vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIBR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIBR vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than XLE's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.61% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIBR and XLE have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIBR has higher volatility (12.35%) compared to XLE (7.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIBR dropped -33.89% vs XLE's -71.26%.
On 10-year performance, CIBR leads with 17.87% vs 9.82% for XLE. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLE has been the lower-risk option at 7.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 17.87% return vs 9.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.
XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.48% for CIBR.
CIBR is categorized as Cybersecurity, while XLE is Energy Equities. CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CIBR and 0.08% for XLE.
XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CIBR and XLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer