CIBR vs. TIME

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) and TIME (Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. CIBR is passively managed, while TIME is actively managed. Over the past year, CIBR returned 25.78% vs 23.44% for TIME. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CIBR charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for TIME.

Performance

CIBR vs. TIME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIBR achieves a 28.52% return, which is significantly higher than TIME's 9.82% return.

CIBR

• 1D: -2.81%
• 1M: 31.43%
• YTD: 28.52%
• 6M: 24.03%
• 1Y: 25.78%
• 3Y*: 28.32%
• 5Y*: 16.28%
• 10Y*: 18.49%

TIME

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: 5.38%
• YTD: 9.82%
• 6M: 10.85%
• 1Y: 23.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIBR vs. TIME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	28.52%	13.06%	15.77%
TIME Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF	9.82%	10.17%	6.75%

Correlation

The correlation between CIBR and TIME is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2024	0.61

The correlation between CIBR and TIME shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CIBR vs. TIME - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CIBR	TIME
Technology	94.0%	38.5%
Industrials	3.5%	1.0%
Communication Services	2.6%	17.4%
Basic Materials	-	3.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	13.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	10.1%
Energy	-	8.4%
Financial Services	-	3.2%
Healthcare	-	0.5%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	5.1%

Return for Risk

CIBR vs. TIME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIBR

CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 26
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 29
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 22

TIME

TIME Risk / Return Rank: 45
TIME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
TIME Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
TIME Omega Ratio Rank: 49
TIME Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
TIME Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIBR vs. TIME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CIBR	TIME	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	1.78	-0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	2.40	-0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.31	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.18	1.80	-0.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.79	6.63	-3.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CIBR vs. TIME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIBR Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the TIME Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIBR and TIME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CIBR	TIME	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	1.78	-0.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.80	-0.14

Drawdowns

CIBR vs. TIME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIBR drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, which is greater than TIME's maximum drawdown of -24.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR and TIME.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIBR	TIME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.89%	-24.26%	-9.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.99%	-13.09%	-8.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.99%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.81%	-0.74%	-2.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.66%	-5.60%	-3.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.25%	3.55%	+5.70%

Volatility

CIBR vs. TIME - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a higher volatility of 10.90% compared to Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME) at 3.48%. This indicates that CIBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CIBR	TIME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.90%	3.48%	+7.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.90%	10.14%	+10.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.50%	13.27%	+11.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.95%	17.62%	+7.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.60%	17.62%	+5.98%

CIBR vs. TIME - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIBR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than TIME's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

CIBR vs. TIME - Dividend Comparison

CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than TIME's 9.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.45%	0.42%	0.29%	0.42%	0.31%	0.59%	1.10%	0.23%	0.23%	0.10%	0.77%	0.58%
TIME Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF	9.12%	10.02%	15.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CIBR and TIME in my portfolio?

CIBR and TIME have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CIBR or TIME?

CIBR has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to TIME (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIBR dropped -33.89% vs TIME's -24.26%.

Which ETF is better, CIBR or TIME?

On 1-year performance, CIBR leads with 25.78% vs 23.44% for TIME. On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, TIME has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CIBR or TIME?

Over the 1-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 25.78% return vs 23.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CIBR or TIME?

CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for TIME.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CIBR or TIME?

TIME has the higher dividend yield at 9.12%, compared with 0.45% for CIBR.

What is the main difference between CIBR and TIME?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Clockwise Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CIBR and 1.00% for TIME.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TIME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.