TIME vs. QYLD

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

TIME (Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TIME is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Clockwise Capital, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. TIME is actively managed, while QYLD is passively managed. Over the past year, TIME returned 20.87% vs 25.53% for QYLD. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TIME charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.

Performance

TIME vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIME achieves a 8.52% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 10.20% return.

TIME

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 8.52%
• 6M: 9.33%
• 1Y: 20.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QYLD

• 1D: 2.43%
• 1M: 4.04%
• YTD: 10.20%
• 6M: 10.75%
• 1Y: 25.53%
• 3Y*: 14.59%
• 5Y*: 8.95%
• 10Y*: 10.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIME vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TIME Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF	8.52%	10.17%	5.94%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	10.20%	9.28%	10.85%

Correlation

The correlation between TIME and QYLD is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2024	0.76

The correlation between TIME and QYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

TIME vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TIME	QYLD
Technology	41.1%	58.7%
Communication Services	15.4%	14.3%
Financial Services	8.9%	0.2%
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	11.4%
Energy	8.3%	0.5%
Industrials	5.3%	2.6%
Basic Materials	5.3%	1.0%
Utilities	4.1%	1.2%
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	6.4%
Healthcare	0.5%	3.7%
Real Estate	-	0.1%

Return for Risk

TIME vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIME

TIME Risk / Return Rank: 40
TIME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
TIME Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
TIME Omega Ratio Rank: 43
TIME Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
TIME Martin Ratio Rank: 39

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 91
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 93
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIME vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TIME	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	2.70	-1.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	3.84	-1.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.60	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.60	5.16	-3.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.79	29.06	-23.27

TIME vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIME Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIME and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TIME vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIME drawdown since its inception was -24.26%, roughly equal to the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIME and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	TIME	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.26%	-24.75%	+0.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.09%	-4.97%	-8.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.06%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.91%	0.00%	-1.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.54%	-3.83%	-1.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.62%	0.88%	+2.74%

Volatility

TIME vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME) has a higher volatility of 5.05% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 4.30%. This indicates that TIME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TIME	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.05%	4.30%	+0.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.98%	8.24%	+2.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.88%	9.49%	+4.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.73%	14.81%	+2.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.73%	15.54%	+2.19%

TIME vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIME has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

TIME vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

TIME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.23%, less than QYLD's 11.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.22%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%
TIME Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF	9.23%	10.02%	15.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TIME and QYLD in my portfolio?

TIME and QYLD have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TIME or QYLD?

TIME has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to QYLD (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIME dropped -24.26% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

Which ETF is better, TIME or QYLD?

On 1-year performance, QYLD leads with 25.53% vs 20.87% for TIME. On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 4.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TIME or QYLD?

Over the 1-year period, QYLD has performed better with a 25.53% return vs 20.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TIME or QYLD?

QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for TIME.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TIME or QYLD?

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.22%, compared with 9.23% for TIME.

What is the main difference between TIME and QYLD?

TIME is categorized as Technology Equities, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Clockwise Capital and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for TIME and 0.60% for QYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.