PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIME vs. HYGW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIME vs. HYGW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME) and iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIME achieves a 8.52% return, which is significantly higher than HYGW's 2.12% return.


TIME

1D
1.51%
1M
0.83%
YTD
8.52%
6M
10.22%
1Y
20.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HYGW

1D
0.24%
1M
1.37%
YTD
2.12%
6M
2.45%
1Y
6.56%
3Y*
5.70%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIME vs. HYGW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TIME and HYGW is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2024

0.52

The correlation between TIME and HYGW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIME vs. HYGW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIME
TIME Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
TIME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIME Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIME Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
TIME Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIME Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

HYGW
HYGW Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
HYGW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYGW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYGW Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
HYGW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYGW Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIME vs. HYGW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME) and iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TIMEHYGWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.49

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

3.62

-2.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.79

16.51

-10.72

TIME vs. HYGW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIME Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the HYGW Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIME and HYGW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TIME vs. HYGW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIME drawdown since its inception was -24.26%, which is greater than HYGW's maximum drawdown of -5.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIME and HYGW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIMEHYGWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.26%

-5.49%

-18.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.09%

-1.82%

-11.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.91%

0.00%

-1.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.54%

-0.60%

-4.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.62%

0.40%

+3.22%

Volatility

TIME vs. HYGW - Volatility Comparison

Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME) has a higher volatility of 5.05% compared to iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW) at 0.91%. This indicates that TIME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYGW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIMEHYGWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.05%

0.91%

+4.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.98%

2.24%

+8.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.88%

2.87%

+11.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.73%

4.67%

+13.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.73%

4.67%

+13.06%

TIME vs. HYGW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIME has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than HYGW's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

TIME vs. HYGW - Dividend Comparison

TIME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.23%, less than HYGW's 11.52% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
HYGW
iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF
11.52%12.53%12.30%15.98%8.71%
TIME
Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF
9.23%10.02%15.84%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TIME and HYGW have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TIME has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to HYGW (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIME dropped -24.26% vs HYGW's -5.49%.

On 1-year performance, TIME leads with 20.87% vs 6.56% for HYGW. On fees, HYGW is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, HYGW has been the lower-risk option at 0.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TIME has performed better with a 20.87% return vs 6.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYGW is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for TIME.

HYGW has the higher dividend yield at 11.52%, compared with 9.23% for TIME.

TIME is categorized as Technology Equities, while HYGW is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Clockwise Capital and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for TIME and 0.69% for HYGW.

HYGW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIME and HYGW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer