PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIBR vs. SHIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CIBR vs. SHIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIBR achieves a 19.63% return, which is significantly lower than SHIP's 82.14% return. Over the past 10 years, CIBR has outperformed SHIP with an annualized return of 17.88%, while SHIP has yielded a comparatively lower -41.99% annualized return.


CIBR

1D
-0.16%
1M
7.94%
YTD
19.63%
6M
15.68%
1Y
18.53%
3Y*
24.30%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
17.88%

SHIP

1D
6.03%
1M
4.29%
YTD
82.14%
6M
73.58%
1Y
151.48%
3Y*
65.24%
5Y*
14.64%
10Y*
-41.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIBR vs. SHIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
19.63%13.06%18.21%39.71%-26.46%19.67%50.53%28.52%1.47%18.61%
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
82.14%38.48%-3.81%61.04%-36.53%70.83%-93.89%-92.71%-51.66%-9.57%

Correlation

The correlation between CIBR and SHIP is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIBR vs. SHIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIBR
CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

SHIP
SHIP Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SHIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHIP Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SHIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHIP Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIBR vs. SHIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIBRSHIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.50

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

8.33

-7.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.86

20.43

-18.57

CIBR vs. SHIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIBR Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the SHIP Sharpe Ratio of 3.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIBR and SHIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CIBR vs. SHIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIBR drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, smaller than the maximum SHIP drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR and SHIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIBRSHIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.89%

-100.00%

+66.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.99%

-18.56%

-3.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.99%

-57.61%

+35.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.89%

-69.11%

+35.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.89%

-99.98%

+66.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.53%

-99.98%

+90.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.66%

-86.56%

+77.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.38%

7.55%

+1.83%

Volatility

CIBR vs. SHIP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) is 12.35%, while Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) has a volatility of 16.12%. This indicates that CIBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIBRSHIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.35%

16.12%

-3.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.72%

33.91%

-12.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.16%

42.69%

-17.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.04%

51.91%

-26.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.65%

98.54%

-74.89%

Dividends

CIBR vs. SHIP - Dividend Comparison

CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than SHIP's 2.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
0.48%0.42%0.29%0.42%0.31%0.59%1.10%0.23%0.23%0.10%0.77%0.58%
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
2.60%3.58%10.58%1.28%25.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CIBR and SHIP have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHIP has higher volatility (16.12%) compared to CIBR (12.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIBR dropped -33.89% vs SHIP's -100.00%.

SHIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.62 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIBR and SHIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer