PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHIP vs. UMAC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SHIP vs. UMAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) and Unusual Machines, Inc (UMAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHIP achieves a 95.36% return, which is significantly higher than UMAC's 66.09% return.


SHIP

1D
-1.85%
1M
30.23%
6M
66.96%
YTD
95.36%
1Y
169.24%
3Y*
56.49%
5Y*
19.08%
10Y*
-47.33%
ALL TIME*
-44.79%

UMAC

1D
3.17%
1M
-4.17%
6M
52.78%
YTD
66.09%
1Y
139.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
96.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.37M$3.67M$3.77M
$64.72M$66.46M$135.77M

SHIP vs. UMAC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
95.36%38.48%1.50%
UMAC
Unusual Machines, Inc
66.09%-24.26%320.50%

Correlation

The correlation between SHIP and UMAC is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2024

0.08

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SHIP:

$369.29M

UMAC:

$713.02M

EPS

SHIP:

$2.87

UMAC:

-$0.16

PS Ratio

SHIP:

1.87

UMAC:

42.82

PB Ratio

SHIP:

1.18

UMAC:

3.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

SHIP:

$194.95M

UMAC:

$17.25M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SHIP:

$98.85M

UMAC:

$5.92M

EBITDA (TTM)

SHIP:

$114.01M

UMAC:

-$28.96M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHIP vs. UMAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SHIP
SHIP Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
SHIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHIP Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
SHIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHIP Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

UMAC
UMAC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
UMAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMAC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
UMAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMAC Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SHIP vs. UMAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) and Unusual Machines, Inc (UMAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHIPUMACDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.23

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.04

2.47

+6.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.34

4.53

+15.81

SHIP vs. UMAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHIP Sharpe Ratio is 3.80, which is higher than the UMAC Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHIP and UMAC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHIP vs. UMAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHIP drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than UMAC's maximum drawdown of -75.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHIP and UMAC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHIPUMACDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-75.61%

-24.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.88%

-52.63%

+33.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-36.68%

-63.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-91.09%

-45.74%

-45.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.37%

28.60%

-20.23%

Volatility

SHIP vs. UMAC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) is 16.86%, while Unusual Machines, Inc (UMAC) has a volatility of 37.62%. This indicates that SHIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHIPUMACDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.86%

37.62%

-20.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.71%

101.13%

-63.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.98%

130.32%

-85.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.90%

162.77%

-110.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

97.78%

162.77%

-64.99%

Dividends

SHIP vs. UMAC - Dividend Comparison

SHIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, while UMAC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
3.32%3.58%10.58%1.28%25.23%
UMAC
Unusual Machines, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SHIP vs. UMAC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. and Unusual Machines, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SHIP and UMAC have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UMAC has higher volatility (37.62%) compared to SHIP (16.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHIP dropped -100.00% vs UMAC's -75.61%.

SHIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.80 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHIP and UMAC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer