SHIP vs. CSTM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) and Constellium SE (CSTM).

Performance

SHIP vs. CSTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) and Constellium SE (CSTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SHIP vs. CSTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SHIP Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.	42.16%	38.48%	-3.81%	61.04%	-36.53%	70.83%	-93.89%	-92.71%	-51.66%	-9.57%
CSTM Constellium SE	30.40%	83.54%	-48.55%	68.72%	-33.95%	28.02%	4.40%	91.70%	-37.31%	88.98%

Fundamentals

Market Cap SHIP : $269.45M CSTM : $3.49B
EPS SHIP : $1.00 CSTM : $1.63
PE Ratio SHIP : 12.89 CSTM : 15.04
PEG Ratio SHIP : 0.04 CSTM : 0.24
PS Ratio SHIP : 1.69 CSTM : 0.49
PB Ratio SHIP : 0.96 CSTM : 4.31
Total Revenue (TTM) SHIP : $158.10M CSTM : $7.19B
Gross Profit (TTM) SHIP : $62.63M CSTM : $729.39M
EBITDA (TTM) SHIP : $78.01M CSTM : $684.28M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHIP achieves a 42.16% return, which is significantly higher than CSTM's 30.40% return. Over the past 10 years, SHIP has underperformed CSTM with an annualized return of -44.70%, while CSTM has yielded a comparatively higher 17.03% annualized return.

SHIP

• 1D: 7.49%
• 1M: -8.56%
• YTD: 42.16%
• 6M: 61.07%
• 1Y: 110.70%
• 3Y*: 43.77%
• 5Y*: 10.89%
• 10Y*: -44.70%

CSTM

• 1D: 6.59%
• 1M: -1.25%
• YTD: 30.40%
• 6M: 65.19%
• 1Y: 143.61%
• 3Y*: 17.17%
• 5Y*: 10.56%
• 10Y*: 17.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SHIP vs. CSTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHIP

SHIP Risk / Return Rank: 92
SHIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
SHIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
SHIP Omega Ratio Rank: 90
SHIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
SHIP Martin Ratio Rank: 91

CSTM

CSTM Risk / Return Rank: 94
CSTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CSTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CSTM Omega Ratio Rank: 91
CSTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CSTM Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHIP vs. CSTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) and Constellium SE (CSTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SHIP	CSTM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	2.85	-0.32
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.99	3.30	-0.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.41	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.91	5.49	-0.58
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.78	20.89	-9.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SHIP vs. CSTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHIP Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the CSTM Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHIP and CSTM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SHIP	CSTM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.53	2.85	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21	0.23	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.45	0.30	-0.75
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.10	0.07	-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between SHIP and CSTM is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SHIP vs. CSTM - Dividend Comparison

SHIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, while CSTM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
SHIP Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.	3.33%	3.58%	10.58%	1.28%	25.23%
CSTM Constellium SE	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

SHIP vs. CSTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHIP drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than CSTM's maximum drawdown of -88.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHIP and CSTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	SHIP	CSTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-100.00%	-88.70%	-11.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.98%	-25.24%	+4.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-69.11%	-66.35%	-2.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.98%	-72.30%	-27.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.99%	-24.11%	-75.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-86.43%	-54.51%	-31.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.75%	6.64%	+2.11%

Volatility

SHIP vs. CSTM - Volatility Comparison

Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) has a higher volatility of 18.09% compared to Constellium SE (CSTM) at 16.98%. This indicates that SHIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SHIP	CSTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.09%	16.98%	+1.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.54%	31.71%	-1.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.15%	50.71%	-6.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.15%	46.36%	+6.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	99.16%	56.52%	+42.64%

Financials

SHIP vs. CSTM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. and Constellium SE over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

SHIP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 25.59M and revenue of 49.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.8%.

CSTM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Constellium SE reported a gross profit of -110.61M and revenue of 942.94M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -11.7%.

SHIP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of 18.53M and revenue of 49.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 37.5%.

CSTM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Constellium SE reported an operating income of 88.42M and revenue of 942.94M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.

SHIP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. reported a net income of 12.31M and revenue of 49.42M, resulting in a net margin of 24.9%.

CSTM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Constellium SE reported a net income of 71.35M and revenue of 942.94M, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.