CIBR vs. GRID

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) and GRID (First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index) are both exchange-traded funds - CIBR is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, while GRID is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ OMX Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CIBR returned 18.49%/yr vs 19.76%/yr for GRID. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CIBR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for GRID.

Performance

CIBR vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CIBR having a 28.52% return and GRID slightly higher at 28.91%. Over the past 10 years, CIBR has underperformed GRID with an annualized return of 18.49%, while GRID has yielded a comparatively higher 19.76% annualized return.

CIBR

• 1D: -2.81%
• 1M: 31.43%
• YTD: 28.52%
• 6M: 24.03%
• 1Y: 25.78%
• 3Y*: 28.32%
• 5Y*: 16.28%
• 10Y*: 18.49%

GRID

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 3.85%
• YTD: 28.91%
• 6M: 29.60%
• 1Y: 51.55%
• 3Y*: 26.27%
• 5Y*: 17.84%
• 10Y*: 19.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIBR vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	28.52%	13.06%	18.21%	39.71%	-26.46%	19.67%	50.53%	28.52%	1.47%	18.61%
GRID First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index	28.91%	29.65%	15.18%	21.57%	-13.89%	27.65%	48.84%	42.80%	-22.69%	27.44%

Correlation

The correlation between CIBR and GRID is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2015	0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between CIBR and GRID has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

CIBR vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CIBR	GRID
Technology	94.0%	11.0%
Industrials	3.5%	65.2%
Communication Services	2.6%	-
Basic Materials	-	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	3.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	20.4%

Return for Risk

CIBR vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIBR

CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 26
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 29
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 22

GRID

GRID Risk / Return Rank: 79
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 74
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIBR vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CIBR	GRID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	2.67	-1.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	3.50	-1.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.45	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.18	4.42	-3.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.79	16.72	-13.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CIBR vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIBR Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIBR and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CIBR	GRID	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	2.67	-1.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.85	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	0.87	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.57	+0.09

Drawdowns

CIBR vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIBR drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, smaller than the maximum GRID drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR and GRID.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIBR	GRID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.89%	-40.56%	+6.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.99%	-11.73%	-10.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.99%	-20.77%	-1.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.89%	-29.64%	-4.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.89%	-40.56%	+6.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.81%	-1.33%	-1.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.66%	-8.43%	-0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.25%	3.09%	+6.16%

Volatility

CIBR vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a higher volatility of 10.90% compared to First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID) at 7.95%. This indicates that CIBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CIBR	GRID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.90%	7.95%	+2.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.90%	16.08%	+4.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.50%	19.39%	+5.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.95%	21.00%	+3.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.60%	22.81%	+0.79%

CIBR vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIBR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

CIBR vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than GRID's 0.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.45%	0.42%	0.29%	0.42%	0.31%	0.59%	1.10%	0.23%	0.23%	0.10%	0.77%	0.58%
GRID First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index	0.77%	1.01%	1.06%	1.23%	1.26%	0.63%	0.68%	1.26%	1.28%	1.07%	1.07%	1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CIBR and GRID in my portfolio?

CIBR and GRID have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CIBR or GRID?

CIBR has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to GRID (7.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIBR dropped -33.89% vs GRID's -40.56%.

Which ETF is better, CIBR or GRID?

On 10-year performance, GRID leads with 19.76% vs 18.49% for CIBR. On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, GRID has been the lower-risk option at 7.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CIBR or GRID?

Over the 10-year period, GRID has performed better with a 19.76% return vs 18.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CIBR or GRID?

CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CIBR or GRID?

GRID has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.45% for CIBR.

What is the main difference between CIBR and GRID?

CIBR is categorized as Technology Equities, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, while GRID tracks NASDAQ OMX Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CIBR and 0.70% for GRID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GRID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.