CIBR vs. CISO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Cerberus Cyber Sentinel Corporation (CISO).

CIBR is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. It was launched on Jul 7, 2015.

Performance

CIBR vs. CISO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Cerberus Cyber Sentinel Corporation (CISO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CIBR vs. CISO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	-12.12%	13.06%	18.21%	39.71%	-26.46%	19.67%	36.85%
CISO Cerberus Cyber Sentinel Corporation	-28.06%	-86.16%	127.69%	-96.02%	-86.92%	851.22%	2.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIBR achieves a -12.12% return, which is significantly higher than CISO's -28.06% return.

CIBR

• 1D: 3.11%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: -12.12%
• 6M: -17.17%
• 1Y: 0.06%
• 3Y*: 14.11%
• 5Y*: 8.62%
• 10Y*: 14.52%

CISO

• 1D: 7.30%
• 1M: -8.11%
• YTD: -28.06%
• 6M: -67.09%
• 1Y: -21.99%
• 3Y*: -59.15%
• 5Y*: -60.04%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CIBR vs. CISO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIBR

CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 12
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 13
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 12

CISO

CISO Risk / Return Rank: 39
CISO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
CISO Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
CISO Omega Ratio Rank: 46
CISO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
CISO Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIBR vs. CISO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Cerberus Cyber Sentinel Corporation (CISO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CIBR	CISO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.00	-0.18	+0.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.17	0.68	-0.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.08	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.03	-0.30	+0.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.07	-0.51	+0.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CIBR vs. CISO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIBR Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is higher than the CISO Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIBR and CISO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CIBR	CISO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00	-0.18	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	-0.39	+0.75
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	-0.38	+0.89

Correlation

The correlation between CIBR and CISO is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CIBR vs. CISO - Dividend Comparison

CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while CISO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.65%	0.42%	0.29%	0.42%	0.31%	0.59%	1.10%	0.23%	0.23%	0.10%	0.77%	0.58%
CISO Cerberus Cyber Sentinel Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CIBR vs. CISO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIBR drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, smaller than the maximum CISO drawdown of -99.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR and CISO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIBR	CISO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.89%	-99.96%	+66.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.96%	-77.32%	+55.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.89%	-99.96%	+66.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.50%	-99.95%	+80.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.66%	-75.70%	+67.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.02%	45.62%	-37.60%

Volatility

CIBR vs. CISO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) is 7.04%, while Cerberus Cyber Sentinel Corporation (CISO) has a volatility of 14.57%. This indicates that CIBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CISO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CIBR	CISO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.04%	14.57%	-7.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.45%	66.71%	-50.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.46%	125.14%	-100.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.21%	153.09%	-128.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.22%	144.78%	-121.56%