PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CISO vs. MSFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CISO vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cerberus Cyber Sentinel Corporation (CISO) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CISO achieves a -29.62% return, which is significantly lower than MSFT's -11.24% return.


CISO

1D
-12.30%
1M
19.85%
YTD
-29.62%
6M
-34.65%
1Y
-65.51%
3Y*
-51.62%
5Y*
-64.50%
10Y*

MSFT

1D
-3.17%
1M
3.54%
YTD
-11.24%
6M
-10.15%
1Y
-6.96%
3Y*
9.26%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
25.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CISO vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CISO
Cerberus Cyber Sentinel Corporation
-29.62%-86.16%127.69%-96.02%-86.92%851.22%2.50%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-11.24%15.58%12.93%58.19%-28.02%52.48%13.86%

Correlation

The correlation between CISO and MSFT is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2020

0.13

The correlation between CISO and MSFT shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CISO:

$15.28M

MSFT:

$3.18T

EPS

CISO:

-$0.12

MSFT:

$16.79

PS Ratio

CISO:

0.47

MSFT:

10.01

PB Ratio

CISO:

1.28

MSFT:

7.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

CISO:

$25.66M

MSFT:

$318.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CISO:

$6.86M

MSFT:

$217.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

CISO:

-$2.13M

MSFT:

$200.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CISO vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CISO
CISO Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
CISO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CISO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
CISO Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
CISO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
CISO Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CISO vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cerberus Cyber Sentinel Corporation (CISO) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CISOMSFTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

0.97

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.80

-0.21

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.20

-0.44

-0.76

CISO vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CISO Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CISO and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CISOMSFTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.68

-0.28

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.43

0.46

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.37

0.75

-1.12

Drawdowns

CISO vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CISO drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CISO and MSFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CISOMSFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.97%

-69.38%

-30.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-82.37%

-33.91%

-48.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-92.89%

-33.91%

-58.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.97%

-37.15%

-62.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.95%

-20.67%

-79.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-76.42%

-21.78%

-54.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

54.51%

15.95%

+38.56%

Volatility

CISO vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

Cerberus Cyber Sentinel Corporation (CISO) has a higher volatility of 38.37% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 9.95%. This indicates that CISO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CISOMSFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

38.37%

9.95%

+28.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

68.05%

22.34%

+45.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

96.45%

25.12%

+71.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

151.21%

26.63%

+124.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

144.12%

27.04%

+117.08%

Dividends

CISO vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

CISO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CISO
Cerberus Cyber Sentinel Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.83%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%

Financials

CISO vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cerberus Cyber Sentinel Corporation and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
6.22M
82.89B
(CISO) Total Revenue
(MSFT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CISO vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cerberus Cyber Sentinel Corporation and Microsoft Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
29.3%
67.6%
Portfolio components
CISO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cerberus Cyber Sentinel Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.82M and revenue of 6.22M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.3%.

MSFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 56.06B and revenue of 82.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

CISO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cerberus Cyber Sentinel Corporation reported an operating income of -1.44M and revenue of 6.22M, resulting in an operating margin of -23.2%.

MSFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.40B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.

CISO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cerberus Cyber Sentinel Corporation reported a net income of -1.59M and revenue of 6.22M, resulting in a net margin of -25.5%.

MSFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 31.78B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CISO and MSFT have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CISO has higher volatility (38.37%) compared to MSFT (9.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CISO dropped -99.97% vs MSFT's -69.38%.

MSFT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.28 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CISO and MSFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer