CISO vs. CGJIX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Cerberus Cyber Sentinel Corporation (CISO) and Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund (CGJIX).

CGJIX is managed by Calvert Research and Management. It was launched on Jun 19, 2015.

Performance

CISO vs. CGJIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cerberus Cyber Sentinel Corporation (CISO) and Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund (CGJIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CISO vs. CGJIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CISO Cerberus Cyber Sentinel Corporation	-28.06%	-86.16%	127.69%	-96.02%	-86.92%	851.22%	2.50%
CGJIX Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund	-9.44%	14.56%	27.74%	36.66%	-26.84%	26.13%	29.61%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CISO achieves a -28.06% return, which is significantly lower than CGJIX's -9.44% return.

CISO

• 1D: 7.30%
• 1M: -8.11%
• YTD: -28.06%
• 6M: -67.09%
• 1Y: -21.99%
• 3Y*: -59.15%
• 5Y*: -60.04%
• 10Y*: —

CGJIX

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: -8.33%
• YTD: -9.44%
• 6M: -7.33%
• 1Y: 13.17%
• 3Y*: 17.08%
• 5Y*: 10.41%
• 10Y*: 15.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CISO vs. CGJIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CISO

CISO Risk / Return Rank: 39
CISO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
CISO Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
CISO Omega Ratio Rank: 46
CISO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
CISO Martin Ratio Rank: 34

CGJIX

CGJIX Risk / Return Rank: 32
CGJIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
CGJIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
CGJIX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
CGJIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
CGJIX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CISO vs. CGJIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cerberus Cyber Sentinel Corporation (CISO) and Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund (CGJIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CISO	CGJIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.18	0.67	-0.85
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.68	1.11	-0.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.16	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.30	0.86	-1.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.51	3.67	-4.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CISO vs. CGJIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CISO Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the CGJIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CISO and CGJIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CISO	CGJIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18	0.67	-0.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.39	0.53	-0.92
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.77	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.38	0.77	-1.14

Correlation

The correlation between CISO and CGJIX is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CISO vs. CGJIX - Dividend Comparison

CISO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CGJIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CISO Cerberus Cyber Sentinel Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CGJIX Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund	3.36%	3.05%	2.04%	0.53%	0.51%	1.85%	1.76%	1.64%	5.72%	2.19%	1.13%

Drawdowns

CISO vs. CGJIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CISO drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than CGJIX's maximum drawdown of -31.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CISO and CGJIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CISO	CGJIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.96%	-31.18%	-68.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-77.32%	-12.62%	-64.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.96%	-31.18%	-68.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.95%	-11.15%	-88.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-75.70%	-5.53%	-70.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	45.62%	2.97%	+42.65%

Volatility

CISO vs. CGJIX - Volatility Comparison

Cerberus Cyber Sentinel Corporation (CISO) has a higher volatility of 14.57% compared to Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund (CGJIX) at 4.74%. This indicates that CISO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGJIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CISO	CGJIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.57%	4.74%	+9.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	66.71%	10.20%	+56.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	125.14%	20.14%	+105.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	153.09%	19.77%	+133.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	144.78%	19.98%	+124.80%