PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGXU vs. EFAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CGXU vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CGXU vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CGXU
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF
-0.20%26.31%4.36%15.75%-14.34%
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
10.06%46.83%3.07%14.65%-4.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGXU achieves a -0.20% return, which is significantly lower than EFAS's 10.06% return.


CGXU

1D
4.28%
1M
-8.73%
YTD
-0.20%
6M
3.86%
1Y
27.03%
3Y*
11.00%
5Y*
10Y*

EFAS

1D
2.54%
1M
-1.59%
YTD
10.06%
6M
15.25%
1Y
39.97%
3Y*
22.57%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGXU vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGXU has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CGXU vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGXU
CGXU Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CGXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGXU Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
CGXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGXU Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

EFAS
EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGXU vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGXUEFASDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.25

2.83

-1.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.78

3.51

-1.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.56

-0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

3.73

-1.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.83

17.19

-10.36

CGXU vs. EFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGXU Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the EFAS Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGXU and EFAS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGXUEFASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

2.83

-1.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.55

-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between CGXU and EFAS is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CGXU vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison

CGXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.32%, more than EFAS's 4.54% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CGXU
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF
5.32%5.31%1.01%0.99%0.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
4.54%4.83%6.76%6.33%7.28%5.19%4.34%5.75%6.63%6.15%0.21%

Drawdowns

CGXU vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGXU drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, smaller than the maximum EFAS drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGXU and EFAS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CGXUEFASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.64%

-44.38%

+18.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.34%

-10.52%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.43%

-1.59%

-7.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.85%

-7.20%

+0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.71%

2.28%

+1.43%

Volatility

CGXU vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) has a higher volatility of 10.77% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) at 5.52%. This indicates that CGXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CGXUEFASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.77%

5.52%

+5.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.57%

8.29%

+7.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.73%

14.22%

+7.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.68%

15.68%

+4.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.68%

18.45%

+1.23%