CGXU vs. DMXF
CGXU (Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF) and DMXF (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. CGXU is actively managed, while DMXF is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CGXU returned 18.00%/yr vs 14.81%/yr for DMXF. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CGXU charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for DMXF.
Performance
CGXU vs. DMXF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGXU achieves a 19.90% return, which is significantly higher than DMXF's 11.52% return.
CGXU
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- 10.58%
- YTD
- 19.90%
- 6M
- 22.54%
- 1Y
- 41.14%
- 3Y*
- 18.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DMXF
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 5.69%
- YTD
- 11.52%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 19.38%
- 3Y*
- 14.81%
- 5Y*
- 6.83%
- 10Y*
- —
CGXU vs. DMXF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGXU Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF | 19.90% | 26.31% | 4.36% | 15.75% | -14.34% |
DMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF | 11.52% | 22.07% | 3.99% | 20.52% | -9.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGXU and DMXF is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022 | 0.90 |
The correlation between CGXU and DMXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
CGXU vs. DMXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CGXU
DMXF
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
CGXU
DMXF
Industrials
CGXU
DMXF
Financial Services
CGXU
DMXF
Basic Materials
CGXU
DMXF
Communication Services
CGXU
DMXF
Energy
CGXU
DMXF
-
Consumer Cyclical
CGXU
DMXF
Consumer Defensive
CGXU
DMXF
Healthcare
CGXU
DMXF
Utilities
CGXU
DMXF
Real Estate
CGXU
-
DMXF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGXU vs. DMXF — Risk / Return Rank
CGXU
DMXF
CGXU vs. DMXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGXU | DMXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.09 | 1.21 | +0.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.85 | 1.80 | +1.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.22 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.14 | 1.64 | +1.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.72 | 6.16 | +5.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGXU | DMXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 1.21 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.65 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
CGXU vs. DMXF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGXU drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, smaller than the maximum DMXF drawdown of -34.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGXU and DMXF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGXU | DMXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.64% | -34.52% | +8.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.14% | -11.84% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.63% | -16.54% | -5.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.14% | -0.56% | -0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.66% | -7.67% | +1.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.52% | 3.15% | +0.37% |
Volatility
CGXU vs. DMXF - Volatility Comparison
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) has a higher volatility of 7.31% compared to iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) at 5.13%. This indicates that CGXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGXU | DMXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.31% | 5.13% | +2.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.05% | 13.29% | +3.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.83% | 16.07% | +3.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.93% | 17.68% | +2.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.93% | 17.25% | +2.68% |
CGXU vs. DMXF - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGXU has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than DMXF's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGXU vs. DMXF - Dividend Comparison
CGXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than DMXF's 4.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGXU Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF | 4.43% | 5.31% | 1.01% | 0.99% | 0.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF | 4.35% | 4.85% | 2.92% | 2.29% | 2.37% | 1.91% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, CGXU and DMXF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CGXU has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to DMXF (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGXU dropped -25.64% vs DMXF's -34.52%.
On 3-year performance, CGXU leads with 18.00% vs 14.81% for DMXF. On fees, DMXF is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, DMXF has been the lower-risk option at 5.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CGXU has performed better with a 18.00% return vs 14.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DMXF is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for CGXU.
CGXU has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 4.35% for DMXF.
They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for CGXU and 0.12% for DMXF.
CGXU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGXU and DMXF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer