CGXU vs. DMXF

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CGXU (Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF) and DMXF (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. CGXU is actively managed, while DMXF is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CGXU returned 14.49%/yr vs 14.62%/yr for DMXF. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CGXU charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for DMXF.

Performance

CGXU vs. DMXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGXU achieves a 14.63% return, which is significantly higher than DMXF's 13.19% return.

CGXU

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: -1.88%
• 6M: 8.43%
• YTD: 14.63%
• 1Y: 33.39%
• 3Y*: 14.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.32%

DMXF

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: -0.14%
• 6M: 9.04%
• YTD: 13.19%
• 1Y: 22.77%
• 3Y*: 14.62%
• 5Y*: 7.21%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CGXU Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF	$32.56M	$32.77M	$32.34M
DMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF	$11.27M	$15.45M	$8.92M

CGXU vs. DMXF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGXU Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF	14.63%	26.31%	4.36%	15.75%	-11.64%
DMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF	13.19%	22.07%	3.99%	20.52%	-10.28%

Correlation

The correlation between CGXU and DMXF is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022	0.90

The correlation between CGXU and DMXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

CGXU vs. DMXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CGXU	DMXF
Technology	24.6%	20.3%
Industrials	15.8%	15.3%
Basic Materials	13.4%	4.9%
Financial Services	12.2%	34.2%
Communication Services	11.3%	5.0%
Consumer Cyclical	7.5%	4.1%
Energy	4.7%	-
Healthcare	4.3%	10.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.1%	2.1%
Utilities	2.1%	0.7%
Real Estate	-	3.0%

Return for Risk

CGXU vs. DMXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CGXU

CGXU Risk / Return Rank: 64
CGXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
CGXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
CGXU Omega Ratio Rank: 61
CGXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
CGXU Martin Ratio Rank: 67

DMXF

DMXF Risk / Return Rank: 55
DMXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
DMXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
DMXF Omega Ratio Rank: 52
DMXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
DMXF Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CGXU vs. DMXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGXU	DMXF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	1.31	+0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	1.90	+0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.23	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.48	1.91	+0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.13	7.17	+0.96

CGXU vs. DMXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGXU Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the DMXF Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGXU and DMXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CGXU vs. DMXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGXU drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, smaller than the maximum DMXF drawdown of -34.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGXU and DMXF.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGXU	DMXF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.64%	-34.52%	+8.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.14%	-11.84%	-1.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.63%	-16.54%	-5.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.17%	-1.47%	-4.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.57%	-7.51%	+0.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.99%	3.14%	+0.85%

Volatility

CGXU vs. DMXF - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) has a higher volatility of 7.13% compared to iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) at 5.40%. This indicates that CGXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGXU	DMXF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.13%	5.40%	+1.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.04%	14.99%	+5.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.61%	17.34%	+5.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.41%	17.89%	+2.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.41%	17.34%	+3.07%

CGXU vs. DMXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGXU has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than DMXF's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGXU vs. DMXF - Dividend Comparison

CGXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, more than DMXF's 4.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CGXU Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF	5.04%	5.31%	1.01%	0.99%	0.95%	0.00%	0.00%
DMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF	4.21%	4.85%	2.92%	2.29%	2.37%	1.91%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGXU and DMXF in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, CGXU and DMXF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CGXU or DMXF?

CGXU has higher volatility (7.13%) compared to DMXF (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGXU dropped -25.64% vs DMXF's -34.52%.

Which ETF is better, CGXU or DMXF?

On 3-year performance, DMXF leads with 14.62% vs 14.49% for CGXU. On fees, DMXF is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, DMXF has been the lower-risk option at 5.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGXU or DMXF?

Over the 3-year period, DMXF has performed better with a 14.62% return vs 14.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGXU or DMXF?

DMXF is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for CGXU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGXU or DMXF?

CGXU has the higher dividend yield at 5.04%, compared with 4.21% for DMXF.

What is the main difference between CGXU and DMXF?

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for CGXU and 0.12% for DMXF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGXU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.