PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGXU vs. DMXF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGXU vs. DMXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGXU achieves a 19.90% return, which is significantly higher than DMXF's 11.52% return.


CGXU

1D
-1.14%
1M
10.58%
YTD
19.90%
6M
22.54%
1Y
41.14%
3Y*
18.00%
5Y*
10Y*

DMXF

1D
-0.56%
1M
5.69%
YTD
11.52%
6M
13.01%
1Y
19.38%
3Y*
14.81%
5Y*
6.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGXU vs. DMXF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CGXU
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF
19.90%26.31%4.36%15.75%-14.34%
DMXF
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF
11.52%22.07%3.99%20.52%-9.22%

Correlation

The correlation between CGXU and DMXF is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022

0.90

The correlation between CGXU and DMXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

CGXU vs. DMXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CGXU
DMXF

Technology

21.6%
18.3%

Industrials

15.4%
16.3%

Financial Services

13.9%
31.6%

Basic Materials

11.0%
4.8%

Communication Services

10.5%
7.0%

Energy

7.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.2%
2.3%

Healthcare

4.7%
10.6%

Utilities

2.5%
0.6%

Real Estate

-

3.9%

Technology

CGXU
21.6%
DMXF
18.3%

Industrials

CGXU
15.4%
DMXF
16.3%

Financial Services

CGXU
13.9%
DMXF
31.6%

Basic Materials

CGXU
11.0%
DMXF
4.8%

Communication Services

CGXU
10.5%
DMXF
7.0%

Energy

CGXU
7.5%
DMXF

-

Consumer Cyclical

CGXU
6.6%
DMXF
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

CGXU
6.2%
DMXF
2.3%

Healthcare

CGXU
4.7%
DMXF
10.6%

Utilities

CGXU
2.5%
DMXF
0.6%

Real Estate

CGXU

-

DMXF
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGXU vs. DMXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGXU
CGXU Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
CGXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGXU Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CGXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGXU Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

DMXF
DMXF Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
DMXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMXF Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
DMXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMXF Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGXU vs. DMXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGXUDMXFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.09

1.21

+0.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.85

1.80

+1.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.22

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

1.64

+1.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.72

6.16

+5.56

CGXU vs. DMXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGXU Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the DMXF Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGXU and DMXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGXUDMXFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

1.21

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.65

-0.09

Drawdowns

CGXU vs. DMXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGXU drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, smaller than the maximum DMXF drawdown of -34.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGXU and DMXF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGXUDMXFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.64%

-34.52%

+8.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.14%

-11.84%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.63%

-16.54%

-5.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

-0.56%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.66%

-7.67%

+1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

3.15%

+0.37%

Volatility

CGXU vs. DMXF - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) has a higher volatility of 7.31% compared to iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) at 5.13%. This indicates that CGXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGXUDMXFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.31%

5.13%

+2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.05%

13.29%

+3.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.83%

16.07%

+3.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.93%

17.68%

+2.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.93%

17.25%

+2.68%

CGXU vs. DMXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGXU has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than DMXF's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGXU vs. DMXF - Dividend Comparison

CGXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than DMXF's 4.35% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
CGXU
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF
4.43%5.31%1.01%0.99%0.95%0.00%0.00%
DMXF
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF
4.35%4.85%2.92%2.29%2.37%1.91%0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, CGXU and DMXF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CGXU has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to DMXF (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGXU dropped -25.64% vs DMXF's -34.52%.

On 3-year performance, CGXU leads with 18.00% vs 14.81% for DMXF. On fees, DMXF is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, DMXF has been the lower-risk option at 5.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CGXU has performed better with a 18.00% return vs 14.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DMXF is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for CGXU.

CGXU has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 4.35% for DMXF.

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for CGXU and 0.12% for DMXF.

CGXU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGXU and DMXF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer