CGXU vs. SCHD
CGXU (Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGXU is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. CGXU is actively managed, while SCHD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CGXU returned 18.46%/yr vs 15.09%/yr for SCHD. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGXU charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
CGXU vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGXU achieves a 21.29% return, which is significantly higher than SCHD's 19.01% return.
CGXU
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 11.03%
- YTD
- 21.29%
- 6M
- 25.41%
- 1Y
- 42.19%
- 3Y*
- 18.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 19.01%
- 6M
- 20.36%
- 1Y
- 28.08%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
CGXU vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGXU Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF | 21.29% | 26.31% | 4.36% | 15.75% | -14.34% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.01% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | 4.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGXU and SCHD is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CGXU and SCHD has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
CGXU vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CGXU
SCHD
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
CGXU
SCHD
Industrials
CGXU
SCHD
Financial Services
CGXU
SCHD
Basic Materials
CGXU
SCHD
Communication Services
CGXU
SCHD
Energy
CGXU
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
CGXU
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
CGXU
SCHD
Healthcare
CGXU
SCHD
Utilities
CGXU
SCHD
Real Estate
CGXU
-
SCHD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGXU vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
CGXU
SCHD
CGXU vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGXU | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.14 | 2.57 | -0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.92 | 3.98 | -1.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.46 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 6.17 | -2.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.31 | 15.20 | -2.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGXU | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 2.57 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.86 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
CGXU vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGXU drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGXU and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGXU | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.64% | -33.37% | +7.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.14% | -4.61% | -8.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.63% | -16.13% | -5.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.40% | +1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.66% | -3.32% | -3.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.52% | 1.87% | +1.65% |
Volatility
CGXU vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) has a higher volatility of 7.23% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.92%. This indicates that CGXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGXU | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.23% | 2.92% | +4.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.01% | 7.66% | +9.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.80% | 10.96% | +8.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.93% | 14.38% | +5.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.93% | 16.72% | +3.21% |
CGXU vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGXU has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGXU vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
CGXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, more than SCHD's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGXU Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF | 4.37% | 5.31% | 1.01% | 0.99% | 0.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.26% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGXU and SCHD have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CGXU has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to SCHD (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGXU dropped -25.64% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 3-year performance, CGXU leads with 18.46% vs 15.09% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CGXU has performed better with a 18.46% return vs 15.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for CGXU.
CGXU has the higher dividend yield at 4.37%, compared with 3.26% for SCHD.
CGXU is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for CGXU and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGXU and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer