CGXU vs. VXUS
CGXU (Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGXU is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. CGXU is actively managed, while VXUS is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CGXU returned 18.00%/yr vs 19.30%/yr for VXUS. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CGXU charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
CGXU vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGXU achieves a 19.90% return, which is significantly higher than VXUS's 14.25% return.
CGXU
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- 10.58%
- YTD
- 19.90%
- 6M
- 22.54%
- 1Y
- 41.14%
- 3Y*
- 18.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VXUS
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 14.25%
- 6M
- 16.92%
- 1Y
- 32.01%
- 3Y*
- 19.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
CGXU vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGXU Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF | 19.90% | 26.31% | 4.36% | 15.75% | -14.34% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 14.25% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | -10.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGXU and VXUS is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022 | 0.95 |
The correlation between CGXU and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
CGXU vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CGXU
VXUS
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
CGXU
VXUS
Industrials
CGXU
VXUS
Financial Services
CGXU
VXUS
Basic Materials
CGXU
VXUS
Communication Services
CGXU
VXUS
Energy
CGXU
VXUS
Consumer Cyclical
CGXU
VXUS
Consumer Defensive
CGXU
VXUS
Healthcare
CGXU
VXUS
Utilities
CGXU
VXUS
Real Estate
CGXU
-
VXUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGXU vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
CGXU
VXUS
CGXU vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGXU | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.39 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.14 | 2.85 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.72 | 11.14 | +0.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGXU | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 2.12 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.39 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
CGXU vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGXU drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, smaller than the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGXU and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGXU | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.64% | -35.97% | +10.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.14% | -11.27% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.63% | -13.58% | -8.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.14% | -0.99% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.66% | -8.22% | +1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.52% | 2.88% | +0.64% |
Volatility
CGXU vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) has a higher volatility of 7.31% compared to Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) at 5.60%. This indicates that CGXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGXU | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.31% | 5.60% | +1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.05% | 13.00% | +4.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.83% | 15.21% | +4.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.93% | 16.05% | +3.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.93% | 17.16% | +2.77% |
CGXU vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGXU has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGXU vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
CGXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than VXUS's 2.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGXU Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF | 4.43% | 5.31% | 1.01% | 0.99% | 0.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.66% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, CGXU and VXUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CGXU has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to VXUS (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGXU dropped -25.64% vs VXUS's -35.97%.
On 3-year performance, VXUS leads with 19.30% vs 18.00% for CGXU. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VXUS has been the lower-risk option at 5.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 19.30% return vs 18.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for CGXU.
CGXU has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 2.66% for VXUS.
CGXU is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VXUS is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for CGXU and 0.05% for VXUS.
VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGXU and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer