CGW vs. GLGG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) and L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (GLGG.L).
CGW and GLGG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CGW is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Water Index. It was launched on May 14, 2007. GLGG.L is a passively managed fund by Legal & General that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Water TR. It was launched on Jun 26, 2019. Both CGW and GLGG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CGW vs. GLGG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CGW vs. GLGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGW Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF | 2.46% | 18.10% | 4.55% | 15.50% | -22.00% | 31.70% | 15.41% | 11.37% |
GLGG.L L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF | 1.81% | 15.95% | 3.98% | 20.62% | -17.38% | 26.68% | 19.02% | 10.94% |
Different Trading Currencies
CGW is traded in USD, while GLGG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GLGG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGW achieves a 2.46% return, which is significantly higher than GLGG.L's 1.81% return.
CGW
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -4.82%
- YTD
- 2.46%
- 6M
- 2.51%
- 1Y
- 17.20%
- 3Y*
- 10.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.16%
- 10Y*
- 10.56%
GLGG.L
- 1D
- 3.31%
- 1M
- -7.61%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 17.69%
- 3Y*
- 12.16%
- 5Y*
- 7.10%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CGW vs. GLGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGW has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than GLGG.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CGW vs. GLGG.L — Risk / Return Rank
CGW
GLGG.L
CGW vs. GLGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) and L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (GLGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGW | GLGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 1.05 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.68 | 1.51 | +0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.20 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 1.30 | +0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.86 | 4.45 | +1.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGW | GLGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 1.05 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.41 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.60 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between CGW and GLGG.L is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CGW vs. GLGG.L - Dividend Comparison
CGW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, while GLGG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGW Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF | 1.54% | 1.58% | 2.27% | 1.55% | 1.45% | 1.59% | 1.41% | 1.48% | 2.14% | 1.71% | 1.65% | 1.67% |
GLGG.L L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CGW vs. GLGG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGW drawdown since its inception was -57.24%, which is greater than GLGG.L's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGW and GLGG.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGW | GLGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.24% | -27.08% | -30.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.33% | -11.62% | +1.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.74% | -18.82% | -13.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.24% | -7.71% | +1.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.87% | -5.06% | -4.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 3.36% | -0.33% |
Volatility
CGW vs. GLGG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) is 5.50%, while L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (GLGG.L) has a volatility of 6.70%. This indicates that CGW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLGG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CGW | GLGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.50% | 6.70% | -1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.30% | 10.89% | -1.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.81% | 16.86% | -2.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 17.11% | -0.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.67% | 19.96% | -2.29% |