GLGG.L vs. IH2O.L
Compare and contrast key facts about L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (GLGG.L) and iShares Global Water UCITS ETF (IH2O.L).
GLGG.L and IH2O.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLGG.L is a passively managed fund by Legal & General that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Water TR. It was launched on Jun 26, 2019. IH2O.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Water TR. It was launched on Mar 16, 2007. Both GLGG.L and IH2O.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GLGG.L vs. IH2O.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLGG.L vs. IH2O.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLGG.L L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF | 0.32% | 7.81% | 5.74% | 14.58% | -7.49% | 27.84% | 14.27% | 4.99% |
IH2O.L iShares Global Water UCITS ETF | 0.72% | 10.23% | 6.31% | 7.67% | -11.13% | 33.06% | 11.63% | 5.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLGG.L achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than IH2O.L's 0.72% return.
GLGG.L
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -10.08%
- YTD
- 0.32%
- 6M
- -0.56%
- 1Y
- 12.04%
- 3Y*
- 8.40%
- 5Y*
- 7.37%
- 10Y*
- —
IH2O.L
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -6.93%
- YTD
- 0.72%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 12.22%
- 3Y*
- 7.31%
- 5Y*
- 7.54%
- 10Y*
- 11.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLGG.L vs. IH2O.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLGG.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than IH2O.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GLGG.L vs. IH2O.L — Risk / Return Rank
GLGG.L
IH2O.L
GLGG.L vs. IH2O.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (GLGG.L) and iShares Global Water UCITS ETF (IH2O.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLGG.L | IH2O.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.79 | 0.93 | -0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 1.29 | -0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.17 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | 1.33 | -0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.22 | 4.16 | -0.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLGG.L | IH2O.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 0.93 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.54 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.60 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLGG.L and IH2O.L is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GLGG.L vs. IH2O.L - Dividend Comparison
GLGG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IH2O.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLGG.L L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IH2O.L iShares Global Water UCITS ETF | 1.77% | 1.78% | 1.34% | 1.51% | 1.32% | 2.25% | 1.29% | 1.84% | 2.30% | 1.98% | 2.17% | 2.45% |
Drawdowns
GLGG.L vs. IH2O.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLGG.L drawdown since its inception was -27.08%, smaller than the maximum IH2O.L drawdown of -35.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLGG.L and IH2O.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLGG.L | IH2O.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.08% | -35.40% | +8.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.62% | -8.60% | -3.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.82% | -23.14% | +4.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.08% | -6.93% | -3.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.06% | -5.77% | +0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 2.75% | +0.78% |
Volatility
GLGG.L vs. IH2O.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (GLGG.L) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to iShares Global Water UCITS ETF (IH2O.L) at 5.40%. This indicates that GLGG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IH2O.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLGG.L | IH2O.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 5.40% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.07% | 8.98% | +1.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.12% | 13.12% | +2.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.91% | 13.86% | +1.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.69% | 14.84% | +2.85% |