CGW vs. FIW
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) and First Trust Water ETF (FIW).
CGW and FIW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CGW is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Water Index. It was launched on May 14, 2007. FIW is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the ISE Clean Edge Water Index. It was launched on May 8, 2007. Both CGW and FIW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CGW or FIW.
Correlation
The correlation between CGW and FIW is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
CGW vs. FIW - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CGW:
0.58
FIW:
1.06
CGW:
0.89
FIW:
1.55
CGW:
1.11
FIW:
1.19
CGW:
0.58
FIW:
1.71
CGW:
1.91
FIW:
4.65
CGW:
4.27%
FIW:
3.50%
CGW:
14.00%
FIW:
15.34%
CGW:
-57.24%
FIW:
-52.75%
CGW:
-10.11%
FIW:
-4.94%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGW achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly lower than FIW's 3.06% return. Over the past 10 years, CGW has underperformed FIW with an annualized return of 8.66%, while FIW has yielded a comparatively higher 13.56% annualized return.
CGW
0.54%
-1.36%
-6.65%
7.95%
6.64%
8.66%
FIW
3.06%
2.22%
0.60%
14.66%
11.81%
13.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CGW vs. FIW - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGW has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than FIW's 0.54% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CGW vs. FIW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CGW
FIW
CGW vs. FIW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) and First Trust Water ETF (FIW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CGW vs. FIW - Dividend Comparison
CGW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, more than FIW's 0.68% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGW Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF | 0.97% | 0.98% | 1.55% | 1.45% | 1.59% | 1.41% | 1.48% | 2.14% | 1.71% | 1.65% | 1.67% | 1.77% |
FIW First Trust Water ETF | 0.68% | 0.70% | 0.68% | 0.67% | 0.37% | 0.56% | 0.55% | 0.73% | 1.13% | 0.51% | 0.76% | 0.75% |
Drawdowns
CGW vs. FIW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGW drawdown since its inception was -57.24%, which is greater than FIW's maximum drawdown of -52.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGW and FIW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CGW vs. FIW - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to First Trust Water ETF (FIW) at 5.22%. This indicates that CGW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.