GLGG.L vs. PHO
Compare and contrast key facts about L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (GLGG.L) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO).
GLGG.L and PHO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLGG.L is a passively managed fund by Legal & General that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Water TR. It was launched on Jun 26, 2019. PHO is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index. It was launched on Dec 6, 2005. Both GLGG.L and PHO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GLGG.L vs. PHO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLGG.L vs. PHO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLGG.L L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF | 0.32% | 7.81% | 5.74% | 14.58% | -7.49% | 27.84% | 14.27% | 4.99% |
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | -3.08% | -0.05% | 10.48% | 12.91% | -4.73% | 32.52% | 17.28% | 1.06% |
Different Trading Currencies
GLGG.L is traded in GBp, while PHO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PHO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLGG.L achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly higher than PHO's -3.08% return.
GLGG.L
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -10.08%
- YTD
- 0.32%
- 6M
- -0.56%
- 1Y
- 12.04%
- 3Y*
- 8.40%
- 5Y*
- 7.37%
- 10Y*
- —
PHO
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- -6.51%
- YTD
- -3.08%
- 6M
- -5.43%
- 1Y
- 1.81%
- 3Y*
- 5.93%
- 5Y*
- 7.53%
- 10Y*
- 13.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLGG.L vs. PHO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLGG.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than PHO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GLGG.L vs. PHO — Risk / Return Rank
GLGG.L
PHO
GLGG.L vs. PHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (GLGG.L) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLGG.L | PHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.79 | 0.10 | +0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 0.28 | +0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.03 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | 0.19 | +0.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.22 | 0.55 | +2.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLGG.L | PHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 0.10 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.44 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.43 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLGG.L and PHO is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GLGG.L vs. PHO - Dividend Comparison
GLGG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLGG.L L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | 0.58% | 0.54% | 0.45% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.34% | 0.47% | 0.75% |
Drawdowns
GLGG.L vs. PHO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLGG.L drawdown since its inception was -27.08%, smaller than the maximum PHO drawdown of -41.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLGG.L and PHO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLGG.L | PHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.08% | -55.62% | +28.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.62% | -11.98% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.82% | -28.60% | +9.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.08% | -10.14% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.06% | -10.19% | +5.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 3.86% | -0.33% |
Volatility
GLGG.L vs. PHO - Volatility Comparison
L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (GLGG.L) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) at 4.85%. This indicates that GLGG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLGG.L | PHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 4.85% | +1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.07% | 11.41% | -1.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.12% | 18.89% | -3.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.91% | 17.26% | -2.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.69% | 19.37% | -1.68% |