CGW vs. GWRS
CGW (Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF) is Water Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Water Index, while GWRS (Global Water Resources, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, CGW returned 9.88%/yr vs 1.11%/yr for GWRS. Their 0.38 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CGW vs. GWRS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGW achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly higher than GWRS's -13.30% return. Over the past 10 years, CGW has outperformed GWRS with an annualized return of 9.88%, while GWRS has yielded a comparatively lower 1.11% annualized return.
CGW
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -1.28%
- 6M
- -0.81%
- YTD
- 3.11%
- 1Y
- 5.96%
- 3Y*
- 9.41%
- 5Y*
- 4.33%
- 10Y*
- 9.88%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.26%
GWRS
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- 6M
- -15.74%
- YTD
- -13.30%
- 1Y
- -22.85%
- 3Y*
- -14.57%
- 5Y*
- -14.31%
- 10Y*
- 1.11%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.42%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.68M | $1.92M | $1.96M | |
| $592.02K | $608.89K | $849.14K |
CGW vs. GWRS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGW Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF | 3.11% | 18.10% | 4.55% | 15.50% | -22.00% | 31.70% | 15.41% | 34.04% | -10.47% | 27.08% |
GWRS Global Water Resources, Inc. | -13.30% | -24.33% | -9.94% | 0.95% | -20.68% | 20.65% | 12.34% | 33.21% | 11.84% | 5.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGW and GWRS is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2016 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGW vs. GWRS — Risk / Return Rank
CGW
GWRS
CGW vs. GWRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) and Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGW | GWRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.90 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | -0.59 | +1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.29 | -0.94 | +2.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGW vs. GWRS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGW drawdown since its inception was -57.24%, smaller than the maximum GWRS drawdown of -63.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGW and GWRS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGW | GWRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.24% | -63.38% | +6.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.86% | -38.17% | +27.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.19% | -48.36% | +34.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.74% | -63.38% | +30.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.72% | -63.38% | +27.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.65% | -60.21% | +54.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.81% | -22.51% | +12.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.84% | 23.62% | -18.78% |
Volatility
CGW vs. GWRS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) is 4.02%, while Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) has a volatility of 8.17%. This indicates that CGW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GWRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGW | GWRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.02% | 8.17% | -4.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.81% | 26.81% | -16.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.88% | 33.79% | -19.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 32.25% | -15.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.61% | 33.61% | -16.00% |
Dividends
CGW vs. GWRS - Dividend Comparison
CGW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than GWRS's 4.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGW Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF | 1.53% | 1.58% | 2.27% | 1.55% | 1.45% | 1.59% | 1.41% | 1.48% | 2.14% | 1.71% | 1.65% | 1.67% |
GWRS Global Water Resources, Inc. | 4.24% | 3.60% | 2.62% | 2.28% | 2.22% | 1.71% | 2.01% | 2.18% | 2.81% | 2.94% | 1.90% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGW and GWRS have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GWRS has higher volatility (8.17%) compared to CGW (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGW dropped -57.24% vs GWRS's -63.38%.
CGW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.45 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGW and GWRS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer