CGW vs. GWRS
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) and Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS).
CGW is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Water Index. It was launched on May 14, 2007.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CGW or GWRS.
Key characteristics
CGW | GWRS | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 10.27% | 0.43% |
1Y Return | 18.48% | 20.17% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 5.02% | -6.59% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 12.36% | 8.87% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.26 | 0.61 |
Daily Std Dev | 14.61% | 33.22% |
Max Drawdown | -57.24% | -51.69% |
Current Drawdown | -0.65% | -32.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGW and GWRS is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CGW vs. GWRS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CGW achieves a 10.27% return, which is significantly higher than GWRS's 0.43% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CGW vs. GWRS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) and Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CGW vs. GWRS - Dividend Comparison
CGW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, less than GWRS's 2.30% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.45% | 1.59% | 1.41% | 1.48% | 2.14% | 1.71% | 1.65% | 1.67% | 1.77% | 1.52% |
Global Water Resources, Inc. | 2.30% | 2.28% | 2.22% | 1.71% | 2.01% | 2.18% | 2.80% | 2.94% | 1.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CGW vs. GWRS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGW drawdown since its inception was -57.24%, which is greater than GWRS's maximum drawdown of -51.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGW and GWRS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CGW vs. GWRS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) is 3.39%, while Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) has a volatility of 9.10%. This indicates that CGW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GWRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.