PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CGW vs. GWRS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CGWGWRS
YTD Return11.05%5.06%
1Y Return26.83%30.05%
3Y Return (Ann)0.64%-8.68%
5Y Return (Ann)10.18%4.09%
Sharpe Ratio1.871.11
Sortino Ratio2.741.74
Omega Ratio1.331.20
Calmar Ratio1.270.80
Martin Ratio9.206.29
Ulcer Index2.91%5.78%
Daily Std Dev14.30%32.89%
Max Drawdown-57.24%-51.69%
Current Drawdown-3.81%-29.24%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between CGW and GWRS is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CGW vs. GWRS - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CGW achieves a 11.05% return, which is significantly higher than GWRS's 5.06% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.46%
8.79%
CGW
GWRS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CGW vs. GWRS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) and Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGW
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CGW, currently valued at 1.87, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.87
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CGW, currently valued at 2.74, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.74
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CGW, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.33
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CGW, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.27
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CGW, currently valued at 9.20, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.009.20
GWRS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GWRS, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.11
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GWRS, currently valued at 1.74, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.74
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GWRS, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.20
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GWRS, currently valued at 0.80, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.80
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GWRS, currently valued at 6.29, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.006.29

CGW vs. GWRS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGW Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the GWRS Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGW and GWRS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.87
1.11
CGW
GWRS

Dividends

CGW vs. GWRS - Dividend Comparison

CGW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than GWRS's 2.23% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CGW
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF
1.40%1.55%1.45%1.59%1.41%1.48%2.14%1.71%1.65%1.67%1.77%1.52%
GWRS
Global Water Resources, Inc.
2.23%2.29%2.26%1.69%2.00%2.19%2.84%2.97%1.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CGW vs. GWRS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGW drawdown since its inception was -57.24%, which is greater than GWRS's maximum drawdown of -51.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGW and GWRS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-3.81%
-29.24%
CGW
GWRS

Volatility

CGW vs. GWRS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) is 4.03%, while Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) has a volatility of 9.51%. This indicates that CGW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GWRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.03%
9.51%
CGW
GWRS