CGW vs. PHO
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO).
CGW and PHO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CGW is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Water Index. It was launched on May 14, 2007. PHO is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index. It was launched on Dec 6, 2005. Both CGW and PHO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CGW or PHO.
Performance
CGW vs. PHO - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGW achieves a 10.92% return, which is significantly lower than PHO's 16.00% return. Over the past 10 years, CGW has underperformed PHO with an annualized return of 9.20%, while PHO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.85% annualized return.
CGW
10.92%
-0.88%
0.86%
19.62%
10.02%
9.20%
PHO
16.00%
1.14%
5.03%
26.54%
14.35%
10.85%
Key characteristics
| CGW | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.50 | 1.84 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.15 | 2.59 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.26 | 1.31 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.25 | 3.60 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.77 | 9.85 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.03% | 2.78% |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.67% | 14.88% |
| Max Drawdown | -57.24% | -55.62% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.92% | -2.39% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CGW vs. PHO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGW has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than PHO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between CGW and PHO is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CGW vs. PHO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CGW vs. PHO - Dividend Comparison
CGW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, more than PHO's 0.46% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGW Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF | 1.40% | 1.55% | 1.45% | 1.59% | 1.41% | 1.48% | 2.14% | 1.71% | 1.65% | 1.67% | 1.77% | 1.52% |
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | 0.46% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.34% | 0.47% | 0.75% | 0.59% | 0.49% |
Drawdowns
CGW vs. PHO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGW drawdown since its inception was -57.24%, roughly equal to the maximum PHO drawdown of -55.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGW and PHO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CGW vs. PHO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) is 3.59%, while Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) has a volatility of 4.55%. This indicates that CGW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.