PortfoliosLab logo
CGW vs. AQWA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CGW and AQWA is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

CGW vs. AQWA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) and Global X Clean Water ETF (AQWA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CGW:

0.31

AQWA:

0.28

Sortino Ratio

CGW:

0.32

AQWA:

0.27

Omega Ratio

CGW:

1.04

AQWA:

1.03

Calmar Ratio

CGW:

0.16

AQWA:

0.12

Martin Ratio

CGW:

0.39

AQWA:

0.34

Ulcer Index

CGW:

6.09%

AQWA:

5.17%

Daily Std Dev

CGW:

15.83%

AQWA:

17.17%

Max Drawdown

CGW:

-57.24%

AQWA:

-29.44%

Current Drawdown

CGW:

-0.53%

AQWA:

-1.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGW achieves a 11.73% return, which is significantly higher than AQWA's 8.80% return.


CGW

YTD

11.73%

1M

5.05%

6M

3.36%

1Y

4.39%

3Y*

9.98%

5Y*

13.18%

10Y*

9.18%

AQWA

YTD

8.80%

1M

3.92%

6M

1.13%

1Y

4.57%

3Y*

11.29%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Global X Clean Water ETF

CGW vs. AQWA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGW has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than AQWA's 0.50% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CGW vs. AQWA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CGW is 2929
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CGW is 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CGW is 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CGW is 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CGW is 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CGW is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

AQWA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AQWA is 2727
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AQWA is 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AQWA is 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AQWA is 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AQWA is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AQWA is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CGW vs. AQWA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) and Global X Clean Water ETF (AQWA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CGW Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is comparable to the AQWA Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGW and AQWA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CGW vs. AQWA - Dividend Comparison

CGW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than AQWA's 1.29% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CGW
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF
2.03%2.27%1.55%1.45%1.59%1.41%1.48%2.14%1.71%1.65%1.67%1.77%
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
1.29%1.40%1.53%1.56%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CGW vs. AQWA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGW drawdown since its inception was -57.24%, which is greater than AQWA's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGW and AQWA.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CGW vs. AQWA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) is 3.28%, while Global X Clean Water ETF (AQWA) has a volatility of 4.04%. This indicates that CGW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AQWA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...