PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLGG.L vs. URTH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GLGG.L vs. URTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (GLGG.L) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GLGG.L vs. URTH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GLGG.L
L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF
0.32%7.81%5.74%14.58%-7.49%27.84%14.27%4.99%
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
-1.26%12.71%20.73%17.75%-8.21%23.43%12.38%0.94%
Different Trading Currencies

GLGG.L is traded in GBp, while URTH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the URTH values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLGG.L achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly higher than URTH's -1.26% return.


GLGG.L

1D
-0.30%
1M
-10.08%
YTD
0.32%
6M
-0.56%
1Y
12.04%
3Y*
8.40%
5Y*
7.37%
10Y*

URTH

1D
2.60%
1M
-3.81%
YTD
-1.26%
6M
1.66%
1Y
16.64%
3Y*
14.42%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
12.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GLGG.L vs. URTH - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLGG.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than URTH's 0.24% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GLGG.L vs. URTH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLGG.L
GLGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
GLGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
GLGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

URTH
URTH Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
URTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
URTH Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
URTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
URTH Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLGG.L vs. URTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (GLGG.L) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLGG.LURTHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.79

0.98

-0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.13

1.46

-0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.23

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

1.65

-0.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.22

7.04

-3.81

GLGG.L vs. URTH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLGG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is comparable to the URTH Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLGG.L and URTH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLGG.LURTHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

0.98

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.78

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.75

-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between GLGG.L and URTH is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

GLGG.L vs. URTH - Dividend Comparison

GLGG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while URTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLGG.L
L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
1.53%1.48%1.47%1.70%1.68%1.50%1.52%2.16%2.30%1.88%2.15%2.35%

Drawdowns

GLGG.L vs. URTH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLGG.L drawdown since its inception was -27.08%, roughly equal to the maximum URTH drawdown of -27.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLGG.L and URTH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GLGG.LURTHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.08%

-34.01%

+6.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.62%

-11.85%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.82%

-26.05%

+7.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.08%

-6.42%

-3.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.06%

-4.42%

-0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

2.44%

+1.09%

Volatility

GLGG.L vs. URTH - Volatility Comparison

L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (GLGG.L) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) at 4.79%. This indicates that GLGG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GLGG.LURTHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.04%

4.79%

+1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.07%

9.03%

+1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.12%

17.14%

-2.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.91%

14.44%

+0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.69%

16.72%

+0.97%