CGW vs. DGT
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) and SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT).
CGW and DGT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CGW is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Water Index. It was launched on May 14, 2007. DGT is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Global Dow Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2000. Both CGW and DGT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CGW or DGT.
Performance
CGW vs. DGT - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGW achieves a 11.58% return, which is significantly lower than DGT's 17.09% return. Over the past 10 years, CGW has underperformed DGT with an annualized return of 9.21%, while DGT has yielded a comparatively higher 9.77% annualized return.
CGW
11.58%
-0.17%
0.99%
20.33%
10.14%
9.21%
DGT
17.09%
0.91%
6.62%
23.48%
12.48%
9.77%
Key characteristics
| CGW | DGT | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.49 | 2.18 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.14 | 2.93 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.26 | 1.39 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.29 | 3.34 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.70 | 14.25 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.03% | 1.65% |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.67% | 10.75% |
| Max Drawdown | -57.24% | -55.36% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.35% | -1.20% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CGW vs. DGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGW has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than DGT's 0.50% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between CGW and DGT is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CGW vs. DGT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) and SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CGW vs. DGT - Dividend Comparison
CGW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than DGT's 2.28% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGW Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF | 1.39% | 1.55% | 1.45% | 1.59% | 1.41% | 1.48% | 2.14% | 1.71% | 1.65% | 1.67% | 1.77% | 1.52% |
DGT SPDR Global Dow ETF | 2.28% | 2.53% | 3.15% | 2.66% | 1.97% | 2.76% | 2.50% | 1.93% | 2.31% | 2.37% | 2.67% | 2.18% |
Drawdowns
CGW vs. DGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGW drawdown since its inception was -57.24%, roughly equal to the maximum DGT drawdown of -55.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGW and DGT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CGW vs. DGT - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) has a higher volatility of 3.53% compared to SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) at 2.89%. This indicates that CGW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.