CENT vs. FCFS
CENT (Central Garden & Pet Company) and FCFS (FirstCash, Inc.) are both stocks. CENT operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while FCFS operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, CENT returned 9.80%/yr vs 18.18%/yr for FCFS. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CENT vs. FCFS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CENT achieves a 33.62% return, which is significantly lower than FCFS's 44.21% return. Over the past 10 years, CENT has underperformed FCFS with an annualized return of 9.80%, while FCFS has yielded a comparatively higher 18.18% annualized return.
CENT
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 11.35%
- YTD
- 33.62%
- 6M
- 33.25%
- 1Y
- 24.74%
- 3Y*
- 13.28%
- 5Y*
- 0.47%
- 10Y*
- 9.80%
FCFS
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 44.21%
- 6M
- 41.64%
- 1Y
- 78.41%
- 3Y*
- 36.75%
- 5Y*
- 25.15%
- 10Y*
- 18.18%
CENT vs. FCFS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CENT Central Garden & Pet Company | 33.62% | -17.14% | -1.12% | 33.81% | -28.84% | 36.31% | 24.27% | -9.81% | -11.49% | 17.62% |
FCFS FirstCash, Inc. | 44.21% | 55.68% | -3.20% | 26.45% | 18.03% | 8.47% | -11.74% | 12.72% | 8.48% | 45.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between CENT and FCFS is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 1993 | 0.19 |
The correlation between CENT and FCFS shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CENT:
$2.74
FCFS:
$10.56
CENT:
15.71
FCFS:
21.67
CENT:
2.22
FCFS:
0.77
CENT:
0.85
FCFS:
1.98
CENT:
$3.16B
FCFS:
$3.88B
CENT:
$1.02B
FCFS:
$2.47B
CENT:
$268.85M
FCFS:
$957.95M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CENT vs. FCFS — Risk / Return Rank
CENT
FCFS
CENT vs. FCFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) and FirstCash, Inc. (FCFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CENT | FCFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.44 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.84 | 6.18 | -5.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.67 | 25.39 | -23.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CENT vs. FCFS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CENT drawdown since its inception was -86.96%, roughly equal to the maximum FCFS drawdown of -90.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CENT and FCFS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CENT | FCFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.96% | -90.26% | +3.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.44% | -12.75% | -16.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.77% | -23.38% | -15.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.77% | -35.70% | -3.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.71% | -50.16% | +0.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.23% | -1.58% | -7.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.08% | -24.23% | -11.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.84% | 3.10% | +11.74% |
Volatility
CENT vs. FCFS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) is 7.74%, while FirstCash, Inc. (FCFS) has a volatility of 12.92%. This indicates that CENT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CENT | FCFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.74% | 12.92% | -5.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.12% | 20.53% | -2.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.69% | 29.79% | +0.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.99% | 29.58% | +1.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.48% | 30.62% | +3.86% |
Dividends
CENT vs. FCFS - Dividend Comparison
CENT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CENT Central Garden & Pet Company | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCFS FirstCash, Inc. | 0.73% | 1.00% | 1.41% | 1.25% | 1.45% | 1.56% | 1.54% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 1.14% | 1.20% |
Financials
CENT vs. FCFS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Central Garden & Pet Company and FirstCash, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CENT vs. FCFS - Profitability Comparison
CENT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Central Garden & Pet Company reported a gross profit of 299.56M and revenue of 906.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.1%.
FCFS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FirstCash, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.05B and revenue of 1.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.9%.
CENT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Central Garden & Pet Company reported an operating income of 113.94M and revenue of 906.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.6%.
FCFS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FirstCash, Inc. reported an operating income of 781.38M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 74.3%.
CENT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Central Garden & Pet Company reported a net income of 79.42M and revenue of 906.15M, resulting in a net margin of 8.8%.
FCFS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FirstCash, Inc. reported a net income of 107.70M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in a net margin of 10.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CENT and FCFS have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCFS has higher volatility (12.92%) compared to CENT (7.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CENT dropped -86.96% vs FCFS's -90.26%.
FCFS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CENT and FCFS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer