CENT vs. ET

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).

Performance

CENT vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CENT vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CENT Central Garden & Pet Company	14.37%	-17.14%	-1.12%	33.81%	-28.84%	36.31%	24.27%	-9.81%	-11.49%	17.62%
ET Energy Transfer LP	19.24%	-9.37%	53.87%	27.87%	55.74%	42.96%	-44.92%	5.88%	-17.74%	-4.66%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CENT : $2.28B ET : $70.45B
EPS CENT : $2.47 ET : $1.37
PE Ratio CENT : 14.86 ET : 14.10
PS Ratio CENT : 0.75 ET : 0.84
PB Ratio CENT : 1.45 ET : 1.44
Total Revenue (TTM) CENT : $3.09B ET : $82.63B
Gross Profit (TTM) CENT : $992.25M ET : $18.01B
EBITDA (TTM) CENT : $314.34M ET : $14.93B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CENT achieves a 14.37% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 19.24% return. Over the past 10 years, CENT has underperformed ET with an annualized return of 11.07%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 20.51% annualized return.

CENT

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: -6.18%
• YTD: 14.37%
• 6M: 12.62%
• 1Y: 0.30%
• 3Y*: 4.57%
• 5Y*: -3.62%
• 10Y*: 11.07%

ET

• 1D: -1.48%
• 1M: 2.44%
• YTD: 19.24%
• 6M: 16.88%
• 1Y: 12.07%
• 3Y*: 25.52%
• 5Y*: 29.51%
• 10Y*: 20.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CENT vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CENT

CENT Risk / Return Rank: 40
CENT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
CENT Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
CENT Omega Ratio Rank: 35
CENT Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
CENT Martin Ratio Rank: 43

ET

ET Risk / Return Rank: 57
ET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
ET Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
ET Omega Ratio Rank: 54
ET Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
ET Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CENT vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CENT	ET	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.01	0.51	-0.50
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.24	0.86	-0.61
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.12	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.08	0.65	-0.58
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.16	1.82	-1.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CENT vs. ET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CENT Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CENT and ET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CENT	ET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01	0.51	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.12	1.17	-1.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32	0.56	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.08	0.36	-0.27

Correlation

The correlation between CENT and ET is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CENT vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

CENT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.87%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CENT Central Garden & Pet Company	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ET Energy Transfer LP	6.87%	7.97%	6.51%	8.95%	7.33%	7.41%	17.27%	9.51%	9.24%	6.66%	5.90%	7.42%

Drawdowns

CENT vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CENT drawdown since its inception was -95.60%, which is greater than ET's maximum drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CENT and ET.

Drawdown Indicators

	CENT	ET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.60%	-87.81%	-7.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.44%	-17.33%	-12.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.60%	-25.82%	-13.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.71%	-72.82%	+23.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.31%	-1.88%	-20.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-48.98%	-25.95%	-23.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.62%	6.24%	+8.38%

Volatility

CENT vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 4.96%. This indicates that CENT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CENT	ET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.20%	4.96%	+2.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.96%	11.68%	+7.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.09%	23.80%	+7.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.01%	25.48%	+5.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.03%	36.63%	-1.60%

Financials

CENT vs. ET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Central Garden & Pet Company and Energy Transfer LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CENT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Central Garden & Pet Company reported a gross profit of 190.61M and revenue of 617.37M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.9%.

ET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 5.78B and revenue of 22.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.8%.

CENT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Central Garden & Pet Company reported an operating income of 16.53M and revenue of 617.37M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.7%.

ET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.37B and revenue of 22.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.

CENT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Central Garden & Pet Company reported a net income of 6.84M and revenue of 617.37M, resulting in a net margin of 1.1%.

ET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.46B and revenue of 22.41B, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.