CENT vs. ET
Compare and contrast key facts about Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CENT or ET.
Correlation
The correlation between CENT and ET is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CENT vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CENT:
0.13
ET:
2.76
CENT:
0.47
ET:
3.63
CENT:
1.05
ET:
1.49
CENT:
0.14
ET:
3.14
CENT:
0.25
ET:
23.54
CENT:
17.05%
ET:
2.28%
CENT:
32.24%
ET:
19.45%
CENT:
-87.13%
ET:
-87.81%
CENT:
-18.66%
ET:
-3.92%
Fundamentals
CENT:
$2.22B
ET:
$69.75B
CENT:
$1.74
ET:
$1.33
CENT:
22.13
ET:
14.99
CENT:
2.56
ET:
0.71
CENT:
$3.22B
ET:
$63.13B
CENT:
$952.49M
ET:
$9.12B
CENT:
$284.76M
ET:
$11.50B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CENT achieves a -0.77% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 3.39% return. Over the past 10 years, CENT has outperformed ET with an annualized return of 18.39%, while ET has yielded a comparatively lower 4.63% annualized return.
CENT
-0.77%
6.83%
-1.31%
-1.26%
10.58%
18.39%
ET
3.39%
2.65%
31.78%
54.36%
20.07%
4.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CENT vs. ET — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CENT
ET
CENT vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CENT vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
CENT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.45%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CENT Central Garden & Pet Company | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 6.45% | 6.51% | 8.96% | 7.33% | 7.44% | 17.28% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% | 2.61% |
Drawdowns
CENT vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CENT drawdown since its inception was -87.13%, roughly equal to the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CENT and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CENT vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) has a higher volatility of 11.12% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 9.52%. This indicates that CENT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CENT vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Central Garden & Pet Company and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities