CEF vs. GDXJ
Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF) and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ).
CEF is an actively managed fund by Sprott. It was launched on Jan 16, 2018. GDXJ is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. It was launched on Nov 10, 2009.
Performance
CEF vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CEF vs. GDXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 4.19% | 92.76% | 24.07% | 6.80% | 1.07% | -8.32% | 31.99% | 16.91% | -6.34% | 18.78% |
GDXJ VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF | 5.50% | 172.28% | 15.67% | 7.12% | -14.53% | -21.25% | 30.40% | 40.44% | -11.02% | 8.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEF achieves a 4.19% return, which is significantly lower than GDXJ's 5.50% return. Over the past 10 years, CEF has underperformed GDXJ with an annualized return of 15.03%, while GDXJ has yielded a comparatively higher 17.38% annualized return.
CEF
- 1D
- 5.58%
- 1M
- -15.38%
- YTD
- 4.19%
- 6M
- 30.06%
- 1Y
- 67.97%
- 3Y*
- 36.15%
- 5Y*
- 21.95%
- 10Y*
- 15.03%
GDXJ
- 1D
- 8.53%
- 1M
- -23.14%
- YTD
- 5.50%
- 6M
- 24.01%
- 1Y
- 114.70%
- 3Y*
- 47.55%
- 5Y*
- 22.70%
- 10Y*
- 17.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEF vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEF has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than GDXJ's 0.54% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CEF vs. GDXJ — Risk / Return Rank
CEF
GDXJ
CEF vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF) and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEF | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.83 | 2.27 | -0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.12 | 2.50 | -0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.36 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 3.52 | -0.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.68 | 12.30 | -2.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEF | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 2.27 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 0.56 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.39 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.07 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between CEF and GDXJ is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CEF vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison
CEF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.10% |
GDXJ VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.21% | 2.33% | 2.61% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% |
Drawdowns
CEF vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEF drawdown since its inception was -62.29%, smaller than the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEF and GDXJ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEF | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.29% | -88.66% | +26.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.77% | -32.92% | +6.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.77% | -51.76% | +24.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.10% | -57.77% | +28.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.41% | -23.14% | +3.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.38% | -60.91% | +33.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.23% | 9.43% | -2.20% |
Volatility
CEF vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF) is 14.73%, while VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a volatility of 20.63%. This indicates that CEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CEF | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.73% | 20.63% | -5.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.36% | 42.33% | -6.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.38% | 50.75% | -13.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.78% | 40.56% | -16.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 44.45% | -22.87% |