CE vs. SCHD
CE (Celanese Corporation) is a stock, while SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) is Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Over the past 10 years, CE returned -2.27%/yr vs 12.35%/yr for SCHD. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CE vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CE achieves a 9.88% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 21.62% return. Over the past 10 years, CE has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of -2.27%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.35% annualized return.
CE
- 1D
- 4.15%
- 1M
- -9.28%
- 6M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 9.88%
- 1Y
- -19.82%
- 3Y*
- -26.55%
- 5Y*
- -19.54%
- 10Y*
- -2.27%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.49%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 3.83%
- 6M
- 16.24%
- YTD
- 21.62%
- 1Y
- 26.25%
- 3Y*
- 13.62%
- 5Y*
- 9.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.27%
CE vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CE Celanese Corporation | 9.88% | -38.76% | -54.57% | 55.69% | -37.77% | 31.75% | 8.25% | 39.85% | -14.31% | 38.52% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 21.62% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between CE and SCHD is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.63 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CE and SCHD has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CE vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
CE
SCHD
CE vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celanese Corporation (CE) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CE | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.43 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 5.72 | -6.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.83 | 13.96 | -14.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CE vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CE drawdown since its inception was -84.87%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CE and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CE | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.87% | -33.37% | -51.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.46% | -4.61% | -35.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.96% | -16.13% | -62.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.96% | -16.85% | -62.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.96% | -33.37% | -45.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.49% | -0.67% | -71.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.93% | -3.30% | -17.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.90% | 1.89% | +22.01% |
Volatility
CE vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Celanese Corporation (CE) has a higher volatility of 12.86% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.61%. This indicates that CE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CE | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.86% | 3.61% | +9.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.75% | 7.95% | +32.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.22% | 11.03% | +45.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.40% | 14.37% | +31.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.34% | 16.71% | +22.63% |
Dividends
CE vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
CE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than SCHD's 3.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CE Celanese Corporation | 0.26% | 0.28% | 4.05% | 1.80% | 2.68% | 1.62% | 1.91% | 1.95% | 2.31% | 1.62% | 1.75% | 1.71% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.19% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CE and SCHD have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CE has higher volatility (12.86%) compared to SCHD (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CE dropped -84.87% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CE and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer