CE vs. WSM
CE (Celanese Corporation) and WSM (Williams-Sonoma, Inc.) are both stocks. CE operates in Chemicals (Basic Materials), while WSM operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, CE returned -1.54%/yr vs 27.25%/yr for WSM. Their 0.38 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CE vs. WSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CE achieves a 5.95% return, which is significantly lower than WSM's 29.38% return. Over the past 10 years, CE has underperformed WSM with an annualized return of -1.54%, while WSM has yielded a comparatively higher 27.25% annualized return.
CE
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -6.14%
- 6M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- 5.95%
- 1Y
- -7.67%
- 3Y*
- -28.37%
- 5Y*
- -20.91%
- 10Y*
- -1.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.31%
WSM
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- 6M
- 12.55%
- YTD
- 29.38%
- 1Y
- 23.56%
- 3Y*
- 51.30%
- 5Y*
- 27.07%
- 10Y*
- 27.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.11%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $84.92M | $80.90M | $96.87M | |
| $173.86M | $200.45M | $243.88M |
CE vs. WSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CE Celanese Corporation | 5.95% | -38.76% | -54.57% | 55.69% | -37.77% | 31.75% | 8.25% | 39.85% | -14.31% | 38.52% |
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 29.38% | -2.09% | 86.56% | 80.24% | -30.49% | 68.60% | 42.38% | 50.07% | 0.61% | 10.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between CE and WSM is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2005 | 0.38 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CE and WSM has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
CE:
$4.90B
WSM:
$26.92B
CE:
-$9.33
WSM:
$8.93
CE:
0.52
WSM:
3.54
CE:
1.21
WSM:
14.66
CE:
$9.49B
WSM:
$7.88B
CE:
$1.91B
WSM:
$3.63B
CE:
$148.00M
WSM:
$1.49B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CE vs. WSM — Risk / Return Rank
CE
WSM
CE vs. WSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celanese Corporation (CE) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CE | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.14 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | 1.03 | -1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.82 | 2.31 | -3.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CE vs. WSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CE drawdown since its inception was -84.87%, roughly equal to the maximum WSM drawdown of -89.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CE and WSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CE | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.87% | -89.01% | +4.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.13% | -23.27% | -13.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.96% | -36.79% | -42.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.96% | -51.92% | -27.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.96% | -59.71% | -19.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.47% | -4.47% | -69.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.00% | -24.96% | +3.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.30% | 10.40% | +8.90% |
Volatility
CE vs. WSM - Volatility Comparison
Celanese Corporation (CE) has a higher volatility of 11.96% compared to Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) at 8.14%. This indicates that CE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CE | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.96% | 8.14% | +3.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.00% | 25.06% | +14.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.14% | 34.47% | +21.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.47% | 44.79% | +0.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.32% | 44.21% | -4.89% |
Dividends
CE vs. WSM - Dividend Comparison
CE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than WSM's 1.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CE Celanese Corporation | 0.27% | 0.28% | 4.05% | 1.80% | 2.68% | 1.62% | 1.91% | 1.95% | 2.31% | 1.62% | 1.75% | 1.71% |
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 1.24% | 1.43% | 1.16% | 1.72% | 2.65% | 1.43% | 1.93% | 2.55% | 3.33% | 2.98% | 3.02% | 2.36% |
Financials
CE vs. WSM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celanese Corporation and Williams-Sonoma, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CE vs. WSM - Profitability Comparison
CE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Celanese Corporation reported a gross profit of 468.00M and revenue of 2.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.0%.
WSM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 793.43M and revenue of 1.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.0%.
CE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Celanese Corporation reported an operating income of 214.00M and revenue of 2.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.
WSM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported an operating income of 291.69M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.
CE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Celanese Corporation reported a net income of 115.00M and revenue of 2.34B, resulting in a net margin of 4.9%.
WSM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a net income of 231.36M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CE and WSM have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CE has higher volatility (11.96%) compared to WSM (8.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CE dropped -84.87% vs WSM's -89.01%.
WSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CE and WSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer