CE vs. WSM
Compare and contrast key facts about Celanese Corporation (CE) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM).
Performance
CE vs. WSM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CE vs. WSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CE Celanese Corporation | 55.65% | -38.76% | -54.57% | 55.69% | -37.77% | 31.75% | 8.25% | 39.85% | -14.31% | 38.52% |
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 2.42% | -2.09% | 86.56% | 80.24% | -30.49% | 68.60% | 42.38% | 50.07% | 0.61% | 10.20% |
Fundamentals
CE:
$7.22B
WSM:
$22.06B
CE:
-$10.57
WSM:
$8.84
CE:
0.76
WSM:
2.88
CE:
1.78
WSM:
10.59
CE:
$9.54B
WSM:
$7.81B
CE:
$1.92B
WSM:
$3.60B
CE:
$193.00M
WSM:
$1.55B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CE achieves a 55.65% return, which is significantly higher than WSM's 2.42% return. Over the past 10 years, CE has underperformed WSM with an annualized return of 1.77%, while WSM has yielded a comparatively higher 23.78% annualized return.
CE
- 1D
- 2.37%
- 1M
- 31.70%
- YTD
- 55.65%
- 6M
- 56.49%
- 1Y
- 16.14%
- 3Y*
- -14.30%
- 5Y*
- -14.00%
- 10Y*
- 1.77%
WSM
- 1D
- 3.10%
- 1M
- -11.34%
- YTD
- 2.42%
- 6M
- -6.09%
- 1Y
- 17.11%
- 3Y*
- 46.82%
- 5Y*
- 17.09%
- 10Y*
- 23.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CE vs. WSM — Risk / Return Rank
CE
WSM
CE vs. WSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celanese Corporation (CE) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CE | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.25 | 0.42 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.82 | 0.87 | -0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.11 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 0.80 | -0.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.63 | 1.81 | -1.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CE | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 | 0.42 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.32 | 0.38 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 | 0.54 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.33 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between CE and WSM is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CE vs. WSM - Dividend Comparison
CE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than WSM's 1.45% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CE Celanese Corporation | 0.18% | 0.28% | 4.05% | 1.80% | 2.68% | 1.62% | 1.91% | 1.95% | 2.31% | 1.62% | 1.75% | 1.71% |
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 1.45% | 1.43% | 1.16% | 1.72% | 2.65% | 1.43% | 1.93% | 2.55% | 3.33% | 2.98% | 3.02% | 2.36% |
Drawdowns
CE vs. WSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CE drawdown since its inception was -84.87%, roughly equal to the maximum WSM drawdown of -89.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CE and WSM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CE | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.87% | -89.01% | +4.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.98% | -20.56% | -22.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.96% | -51.92% | -27.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.96% | -59.71% | -19.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.03% | -17.37% | -43.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.27% | -25.10% | +4.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.42% | 9.07% | +15.35% |
Volatility
CE vs. WSM - Volatility Comparison
Celanese Corporation (CE) has a higher volatility of 21.32% compared to Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) at 8.53%. This indicates that CE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CE | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.32% | 8.53% | +12.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.02% | 23.90% | +17.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.73% | 40.81% | +22.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.12% | 44.73% | -0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.60% | 44.20% | -5.60% |
Financials
CE vs. WSM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celanese Corporation and Williams-Sonoma, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CE vs. WSM - Profitability Comparison
CE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celanese Corporation reported a gross profit of 383.00M and revenue of 2.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.4%.
WSM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.10B and revenue of 2.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.9%.
CE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celanese Corporation reported an operating income of 128.00M and revenue of 2.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.8%.
WSM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported an operating income of 477.81M and revenue of 2.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.3%.
CE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celanese Corporation reported a net income of 19.00M and revenue of 2.20B, resulting in a net margin of 0.9%.
WSM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a net income of 368.02M and revenue of 2.36B, resulting in a net margin of 15.6%.