PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CE vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CECOST
YTD Return1.58%11.30%
1Y Return58.55%54.22%
3Y Return (Ann)1.45%26.37%
5Y Return (Ann)9.95%26.80%
10Y Return (Ann)12.11%23.07%
Sharpe Ratio2.012.93
Daily Std Dev28.04%18.00%
Max Drawdown-84.87%-70.95%
Current Drawdown-8.59%-6.62%

Fundamentals


CECOST
Market Cap$17.24B$323.39B
EPS$18.00$15.31
PE Ratio8.5847.63
PEG Ratio4.425.15
Revenue (TTM)$10.94B$248.83B
Gross Profit (TTM)$2.38B$30.10B
EBITDA (TTM)$1.83B$11.07B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between CE and COST is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CE vs. COST - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CE achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 11.30% return. Over the past 10 years, CE has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 12.11%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.07% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


1,000.00%1,500.00%2,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1,184.63%
2,221.68%
CE
COST

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Celanese Corporation

Costco Wholesale Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CE vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celanese Corporation (CE) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CE
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CE, currently valued at 2.01, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.002.01
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CE, currently valued at 2.77, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.77
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CE, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.34
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CE, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.41
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CE, currently valued at 10.85, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0010.85
COST
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for COST, currently valued at 2.93, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.002.93
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for COST, currently valued at 3.62, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.62
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for COST, currently valued at 1.55, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.55
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for COST, currently valued at 2.65, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.65
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for COST, currently valued at 14.94, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0014.94

CE vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CE Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CE and COST.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
2.01
2.93
CE
COST

Dividends

CE vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

CE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than COST's 2.76% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CE
Celanese Corporation
1.79%1.80%2.68%1.62%1.91%1.95%2.31%1.62%1.75%1.71%1.55%0.95%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
2.76%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%1.01%

Drawdowns

CE vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CE drawdown since its inception was -84.87%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -70.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CE and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-8.59%
-6.62%
CE
COST

Volatility

CE vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Celanese Corporation (CE) has a higher volatility of 7.88% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 3.66%. This indicates that CE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
7.88%
3.66%
CE
COST

Financials

CE vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celanese Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items