PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CE vs. COST
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

CE vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Celanese Corporation (CE) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CE vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CE
Celanese Corporation
55.65%-38.76%-54.57%55.69%-37.77%31.75%8.25%39.85%-14.31%38.52%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
15.71%-5.39%39.62%49.00%-19.05%51.82%32.67%45.70%10.60%22.37%

Fundamentals

EPS

CE:

-$10.57

COST:

$25.63

PS Ratio

CE:

0.76

COST:

1.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

CE:

$9.54B

COST:

$286.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CE:

$1.92B

COST:

$19.33B

EBITDA (TTM)

CE:

$193.00M

COST:

$12.73B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CE achieves a 55.65% return, which is significantly higher than COST's 15.71% return. Over the past 10 years, CE has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 1.77%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 22.28% annualized return.


CE

1D
2.37%
1M
31.70%
YTD
55.65%
6M
56.49%
1Y
16.14%
3Y*
-14.30%
5Y*
-14.00%
10Y*
1.77%

COST

1D
-0.02%
1M
-1.42%
YTD
15.71%
6M
7.95%
1Y
5.93%
3Y*
27.83%
5Y*
24.28%
10Y*
22.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CE vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CE
CE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
CE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
CE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
CE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
COST Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CE vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celanese Corporation (CE) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CECOSTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.25

0.30

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.82

0.57

+0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.07

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

0.40

-0.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.63

0.80

-0.18

CE vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CE Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is comparable to the COST Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CE and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CECOSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

0.30

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.32

1.08

-1.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

1.02

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.59

-0.39

Correlation

The correlation between CE and COST is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CE vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

CE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than COST's 0.52% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CE
Celanese Corporation
0.18%0.28%4.05%1.80%2.68%1.62%1.91%1.95%2.31%1.62%1.75%1.71%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.52%0.59%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%

Drawdowns

CE vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CE drawdown since its inception was -84.87%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CE and COST.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CECOSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.87%

-53.39%

-31.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.98%

-19.35%

-23.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.96%

-31.40%

-47.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.96%

-31.40%

-47.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.03%

-6.96%

-54.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.27%

-13.40%

-6.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.42%

9.67%

+14.75%

Volatility

CE vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Celanese Corporation (CE) has a higher volatility of 21.32% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 4.41%. This indicates that CE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CECOSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.32%

4.41%

+16.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.02%

13.36%

+27.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.73%

20.15%

+43.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.12%

22.51%

+21.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.60%

21.90%

+16.70%

Financials

CE vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celanese Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
2.20B
69.60B
(CE) Total Revenue
(COST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CE vs. COST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Celanese Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
17.4%
-12.6%
Portfolio components
CE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celanese Corporation reported a gross profit of 383.00M and revenue of 2.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.4%.

COST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -8.80B and revenue of 69.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -12.6%.

CE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celanese Corporation reported an operating income of 128.00M and revenue of 2.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.8%.

COST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.61B and revenue of 69.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.

CE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celanese Corporation reported a net income of 19.00M and revenue of 2.20B, resulting in a net margin of 0.9%.

COST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.04B and revenue of 69.60B, resulting in a net margin of 2.9%.