CE vs. HUN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Celanese Corporation (CE) and Huntsman Corporation (HUN).

Performance

CE vs. HUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Celanese Corporation (CE) and Huntsman Corporation (HUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CE vs. HUN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CE Celanese Corporation	55.65%	-38.76%	-54.57%	55.69%	-37.77%	31.75%	8.25%	39.85%	-14.31%	38.52%
HUN Huntsman Corporation	34.02%	-40.65%	-24.97%	-5.11%	-18.97%	42.29%	7.53%	28.98%	-40.64%	77.93%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CE : $7.22B HUN : $2.30B
EPS CE : -$10.57 HUN : -$1.64
PS Ratio CE : 0.76 HUN : 0.41
PB Ratio CE : 1.78 HUN : 0.34
Total Revenue (TTM) CE : $9.54B HUN : $5.68B
Gross Profit (TTM) CE : $1.92B HUN : $751.00M
EBITDA (TTM) CE : $193.00M HUN : $81.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CE achieves a 55.65% return, which is significantly higher than HUN's 34.02% return. Over the past 10 years, CE has underperformed HUN with an annualized return of 1.77%, while HUN has yielded a comparatively higher 3.29% annualized return.

CE

• 1D: 2.37%
• 1M: 31.70%
• YTD: 55.65%
• 6M: 56.49%
• 1Y: 16.14%
• 3Y*: -14.30%
• 5Y*: -14.00%
• 10Y*: 1.77%

HUN

• 1D: 5.89%
• 1M: 5.94%
• YTD: 34.02%
• 6M: 50.48%
• 1Y: -10.51%
• 3Y*: -17.38%
• 5Y*: -11.14%
• 10Y*: 3.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CE vs. HUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CE

CE Risk / Return Rank: 51
CE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
CE Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
CE Omega Ratio Rank: 50
CE Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
CE Martin Ratio Rank: 49

HUN

HUN Risk / Return Rank: 34
HUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
HUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
HUN Omega Ratio Rank: 33
HUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
HUN Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CE vs. HUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celanese Corporation (CE) and Huntsman Corporation (HUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CE	HUN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.25	-0.17	+0.43
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.82	0.17	+0.65
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.02	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.36	-0.21	+0.57
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.63	-0.36	+0.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CE vs. HUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CE Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is higher than the HUN Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CE and HUN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CE	HUN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25	-0.17	+0.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.32	-0.29	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.05	0.08	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.00	+0.20

Correlation

The correlation between CE and HUN is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CE vs. HUN - Dividend Comparison

CE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than HUN's 5.07% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CE Celanese Corporation	0.18%	0.28%	4.05%	1.80%	2.68%	1.62%	1.91%	1.95%	2.31%	1.62%	1.75%	1.71%
HUN Huntsman Corporation	5.07%	8.38%	5.55%	3.78%	3.09%	2.08%	2.59%	2.69%	3.37%	1.50%	2.62%	4.40%

Drawdowns

CE vs. HUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CE drawdown since its inception was -84.87%, smaller than the maximum HUN drawdown of -92.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CE and HUN.

Drawdown Indicators

	CE	HUN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.87%	-92.21%	+7.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.98%	-50.01%	+7.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-78.96%	-78.67%	-0.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-78.96%	-78.67%	-0.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.03%	-61.15%	+0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.27%	-33.70%	+13.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.42%	29.96%	-5.54%

Volatility

CE vs. HUN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Celanese Corporation (CE) is 21.32%, while Huntsman Corporation (HUN) has a volatility of 23.58%. This indicates that CE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CE	HUN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.32%	23.58%	-2.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.02%	44.13%	-3.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	63.73%	60.43%	+3.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.12%	38.93%	+5.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.60%	39.73%	-1.13%

Financials

CE vs. HUN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Celanese Corporation and Huntsman Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celanese Corporation reported a gross profit of 383.00M and revenue of 2.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.4%.

HUN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Huntsman Corporation reported a gross profit of 164.00M and revenue of 1.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.1%.

CE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celanese Corporation reported an operating income of 128.00M and revenue of 2.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.8%.

HUN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Huntsman Corporation reported an operating income of -146.00M and revenue of 1.36B, resulting in an operating margin of -10.8%.

CE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celanese Corporation reported a net income of 19.00M and revenue of 2.20B, resulting in a net margin of 0.9%.

HUN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Huntsman Corporation reported a net income of -96.00M and revenue of 1.36B, resulting in a net margin of -7.1%.