CE vs. HUN
CE (Celanese Corporation) and HUN (Huntsman Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Chemicals industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, CE returned -1.23%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for HUN. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CE vs. HUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CE achieves a 13.95% return, which is significantly lower than HUN's 15.22% return. Over the past 10 years, CE has underperformed HUN with an annualized return of -1.23%, while HUN has yielded a comparatively higher 0.97% annualized return.
CE
- 1D
- -3.22%
- 1M
- -8.13%
- YTD
- 13.95%
- 6M
- 14.96%
- 1Y
- -11.65%
- 3Y*
- -23.07%
- 5Y*
- -19.07%
- 10Y*
- -1.23%
HUN
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -21.13%
- YTD
- 15.22%
- 6M
- 16.15%
- 1Y
- 13.14%
- 3Y*
- -19.72%
- 5Y*
- -12.22%
- 10Y*
- 0.97%
CE vs. HUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CE Celanese Corporation | 13.95% | -38.76% | -54.57% | 55.69% | -37.77% | 31.75% | 8.25% | 39.85% | -14.31% | 38.52% |
HUN Huntsman Corporation | 15.22% | -40.65% | -24.97% | -5.11% | -18.97% | 42.29% | 7.53% | 28.98% | -40.64% | 77.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between CE and HUN is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2005 | 0.58 |
The correlation between CE and HUN shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CE:
$5.29B
HUN:
$1.97B
CE:
-$9.33
HUN:
-$1.92
CE:
0.56
HUN:
0.35
CE:
1.30
HUN:
0.28
CE:
$9.49B
HUN:
$5.69B
CE:
$1.91B
HUN:
$733.00M
CE:
$148.00M
HUN:
$54.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CE vs. HUN — Risk / Return Rank
CE
HUN
CE vs. HUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celanese Corporation (CE) and Huntsman Corporation (HUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CE | HUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.09 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 0.36 | -0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.48 | 0.86 | -1.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CE vs. HUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CE drawdown since its inception was -84.87%, smaller than the maximum HUN drawdown of -92.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CE and HUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CE | HUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.87% | -92.21% | +7.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.98% | -37.08% | -5.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.96% | -71.81% | -7.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.96% | -78.67% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.96% | -78.67% | -0.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.47% | -66.60% | -4.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.74% | -33.96% | +13.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.37% | 15.26% | +9.11% |
Volatility
CE vs. HUN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Celanese Corporation (CE) is 11.87%, while Huntsman Corporation (HUN) has a volatility of 22.77%. This indicates that CE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CE | HUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.87% | 22.77% | -10.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.89% | 45.88% | -5.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.24% | 59.06% | -2.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.21% | 40.28% | +4.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.26% | 40.20% | -0.94% |
Dividends
CE vs. HUN - Dividend Comparison
CE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than HUN's 4.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CE Celanese Corporation | 0.25% | 0.28% | 4.05% | 1.80% | 2.68% | 1.62% | 1.91% | 1.95% | 2.31% | 1.62% | 1.75% | 1.71% |
HUN Huntsman Corporation | 4.50% | 8.38% | 5.55% | 3.78% | 3.09% | 2.08% | 2.59% | 2.69% | 3.37% | 1.50% | 2.62% | 4.40% |
Financials
CE vs. HUN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celanese Corporation and Huntsman Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CE vs. HUN - Profitability Comparison
CE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celanese Corporation reported a gross profit of 468.00M and revenue of 2.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.0%.
HUN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Huntsman Corporation reported a gross profit of 183.00M and revenue of 1.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.9%.
CE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celanese Corporation reported an operating income of 214.00M and revenue of 2.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.
HUN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Huntsman Corporation reported an operating income of -16.00M and revenue of 1.42B, resulting in an operating margin of -1.1%.
CE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celanese Corporation reported a net income of 115.00M and revenue of 2.34B, resulting in a net margin of 4.9%.
HUN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Huntsman Corporation reported a net income of -53.00M and revenue of 1.42B, resulting in a net margin of -3.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CE and HUN have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HUN has higher volatility (22.77%) compared to CE (11.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CE dropped -84.87% vs HUN's -92.21%.
HUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CE and HUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer