PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CE vs. SMH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CE and SMH is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

CE vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Celanese Corporation (CE) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

500.00%1,000.00%1,500.00%2,000.00%2,500.00%3,000.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
502.82%
3,043.30%
CE
SMH

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CE:

-1.21

SMH:

1.38

Sortino Ratio

CE:

-1.64

SMH:

1.90

Omega Ratio

CE:

0.74

SMH:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

CE:

-0.78

SMH:

1.96

Martin Ratio

CE:

-1.62

SMH:

4.70

Ulcer Index

CE:

29.66%

SMH:

10.32%

Daily Std Dev

CE:

39.70%

SMH:

35.08%

Max Drawdown

CE:

-84.87%

SMH:

-83.29%

Current Drawdown

CE:

-57.11%

SMH:

-7.78%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CE achieves a 4.91% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 6.64% return. Over the past 10 years, CE has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 4.43%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 26.76% annualized return.


CE

YTD

4.91%

1M

8.32%

6M

-47.15%

1Y

-48.97%

5Y*

-7.18%

10Y*

4.43%

SMH

YTD

6.64%

1M

7.19%

6M

4.54%

1Y

43.86%

5Y*

29.70%

10Y*

26.76%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CE vs. SMH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CE is 33
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CE is 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CE is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CE is 22
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CE is 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CE is 33
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SMH is 5353
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SMH is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SMH is 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SMH is 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SMH is 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SMH is 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CE vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celanese Corporation (CE) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CE, currently valued at -1.21, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.00-1.211.38
The chart of Sortino ratio for CE, currently valued at -1.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-1.641.90
The chart of Omega ratio for CE, currently valued at 0.74, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.741.24
The chart of Calmar ratio for CE, currently valued at -0.78, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.781.96
The chart of Martin ratio for CE, currently valued at -1.62, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-1.624.70
CE
SMH

The current CE Sharpe Ratio is -1.21, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CE and SMH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-1.21
1.38
CE
SMH

Dividends

CE vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

CE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, more than SMH's 0.41% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CE
Celanese Corporation
3.86%4.05%1.80%2.68%1.62%1.91%1.95%2.31%1.62%1.75%1.71%1.55%
SMH
VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF
0.41%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%1.16%

Drawdowns

CE vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CE drawdown since its inception was -84.87%, roughly equal to the maximum SMH drawdown of -83.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CE and SMH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-57.11%
-7.78%
CE
SMH

Volatility

CE vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

Celanese Corporation (CE) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) have volatilities of 8.66% and 8.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
8.66%
8.78%
CE
SMH
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab