PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CE vs. SMH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CESMH
YTD Return-51.46%41.92%
1Y Return-40.75%54.88%
3Y Return (Ann)-22.19%19.80%
5Y Return (Ann)-8.12%32.98%
10Y Return (Ann)4.32%28.72%
Sharpe Ratio-1.041.60
Sortino Ratio-1.262.12
Omega Ratio0.791.28
Calmar Ratio-0.712.22
Martin Ratio-2.266.05
Ulcer Index17.74%9.08%
Daily Std Dev38.66%34.27%
Max Drawdown-84.87%-95.73%
Current Drawdown-56.32%-11.76%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between CE and SMH is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CE vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CE achieves a -51.46% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 41.92% return. Over the past 10 years, CE has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 4.32%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 28.72% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-52.00%
6.88%
CE
SMH

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CE vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celanese Corporation (CE) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CE
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CE, currently valued at -1.04, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-1.04
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CE, currently valued at -1.26, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-1.26
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CE, currently valued at 0.79, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.79
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CE, currently valued at -0.71, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.71
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CE, currently valued at -2.26, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-2.26
SMH
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SMH, currently valued at 1.60, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.60
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SMH, currently valued at 2.12, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.12
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SMH, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.28
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SMH, currently valued at 2.22, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.22
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SMH, currently valued at 6.05, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.006.05

CE vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CE Sharpe Ratio is -1.04, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CE and SMH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.04
1.60
CE
SMH

Dividends

CE vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

CE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, more than SMH's 0.42% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CE
Celanese Corporation
3.79%1.80%2.68%1.62%1.91%1.95%2.31%1.62%1.75%1.71%1.55%0.95%
SMH
VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF
0.42%0.60%2.37%1.02%1.38%6.00%3.75%2.85%1.61%4.28%2.31%3.11%

Drawdowns

CE vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CE drawdown since its inception was -84.87%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -95.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CE and SMH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-56.32%
-11.76%
CE
SMH

Volatility

CE vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

Celanese Corporation (CE) has a higher volatility of 30.81% compared to VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 7.72%. This indicates that CE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
30.81%
7.72%
CE
SMH