PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CE vs. TRIN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CETRIN
YTD Return-51.46%8.50%
1Y Return-40.75%11.96%
3Y Return (Ann)-22.19%8.43%
Sharpe Ratio-1.040.76
Sortino Ratio-1.261.15
Omega Ratio0.791.15
Calmar Ratio-0.711.44
Martin Ratio-2.263.45
Ulcer Index17.74%3.64%
Daily Std Dev38.66%16.53%
Max Drawdown-84.87%-43.12%
Current Drawdown-56.32%-0.77%

Fundamentals


CETRIN
Market Cap$8.27B$828.22M
EPS$17.67$1.70
PE Ratio4.288.27
PEG Ratio4.425.26
Total Revenue (TTM)$10.48B$183.61M
Gross Profit (TTM)$2.36B$143.84M
EBITDA (TTM)$1.47B$95.28M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between CE and TRIN is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CE vs. TRIN - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CE achieves a -51.46% return, which is significantly lower than TRIN's 8.50% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-52.00%
2.37%
CE
TRIN

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CE vs. TRIN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celanese Corporation (CE) and Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CE
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CE, currently valued at -1.04, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-1.04
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CE, currently valued at -1.26, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-1.26
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CE, currently valued at 0.79, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.79
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CE, currently valued at -0.71, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.71
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CE, currently valued at -2.26, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-2.26
TRIN
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TRIN, currently valued at 0.76, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.76
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TRIN, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.15
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TRIN, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.15
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TRIN, currently valued at 1.44, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.44
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TRIN, currently valued at 3.45, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.45

CE vs. TRIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CE Sharpe Ratio is -1.04, which is lower than the TRIN Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CE and TRIN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.04
0.76
CE
TRIN

Dividends

CE vs. TRIN - Dividend Comparison

CE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, less than TRIN's 14.34% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CE
Celanese Corporation
3.79%1.80%2.68%1.62%1.91%1.95%2.31%1.62%1.75%1.71%1.55%0.95%
TRIN
Trinity Capital Inc.
14.34%14.04%21.32%7.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CE vs. TRIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CE drawdown since its inception was -84.87%, which is greater than TRIN's maximum drawdown of -43.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CE and TRIN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-56.32%
-0.77%
CE
TRIN

Volatility

CE vs. TRIN - Volatility Comparison

Celanese Corporation (CE) has a higher volatility of 30.81% compared to Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN) at 7.24%. This indicates that CE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
30.81%
7.24%
CE
TRIN

Financials

CE vs. TRIN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celanese Corporation and Trinity Capital Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items