CE vs. ALB
Compare and contrast key facts about Celanese Corporation (CE) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB).
Performance
CE vs. ALB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CE vs. ALB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CE Celanese Corporation | 55.65% | -38.76% | -54.57% | 55.69% | -37.77% | 31.75% | 8.25% | 39.85% | -14.31% | 38.52% |
ALB Albemarle Corporation | 27.24% | 67.72% | -39.50% | -32.80% | -6.63% | 59.76% | 105.39% | -3.28% | -38.89% | 50.22% |
Fundamentals
CE:
$7.22B
ALB:
$21.13B
CE:
-$10.57
ALB:
-$4.69
CE:
0.76
ALB:
4.11
CE:
1.78
ALB:
2.90
CE:
$9.54B
ALB:
$5.14B
CE:
$1.92B
ALB:
$668.72M
CE:
$193.00M
ALB:
$221.01M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CE achieves a 55.65% return, which is significantly higher than ALB's 27.24% return. Over the past 10 years, CE has underperformed ALB with an annualized return of 1.77%, while ALB has yielded a comparatively higher 12.16% annualized return.
CE
- 1D
- 2.37%
- 1M
- 31.70%
- YTD
- 55.65%
- 6M
- 56.49%
- 1Y
- 16.14%
- 3Y*
- -14.30%
- 5Y*
- -14.00%
- 10Y*
- 1.77%
ALB
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 27.24%
- 6M
- 122.64%
- 1Y
- 153.65%
- 3Y*
- -5.28%
- 5Y*
- 4.79%
- 10Y*
- 12.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CE vs. ALB — Risk / Return Rank
CE
ALB
CE vs. ALB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celanese Corporation (CE) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CE | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.25 | 2.39 | -2.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.82 | 2.63 | -1.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.35 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 5.15 | -4.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.63 | 12.66 | -12.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CE | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 | 2.39 | -2.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.32 | 0.09 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 | 0.26 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.31 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between CE and ALB is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CE vs. ALB - Dividend Comparison
CE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than ALB's 0.90% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CE Celanese Corporation | 0.18% | 0.28% | 4.05% | 1.80% | 2.68% | 1.62% | 1.91% | 1.95% | 2.31% | 1.62% | 1.75% | 1.71% |
ALB Albemarle Corporation | 0.90% | 1.15% | 1.87% | 1.11% | 0.73% | 0.67% | 1.04% | 2.01% | 1.74% | 1.00% | 1.42% | 2.07% |
Drawdowns
CE vs. ALB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CE drawdown since its inception was -84.87%, roughly equal to the maximum ALB drawdown of -83.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CE and ALB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CE | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.87% | -83.90% | -0.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.98% | -29.74% | -13.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.96% | -83.90% | +4.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.96% | -83.90% | +4.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.03% | -42.07% | -18.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.27% | -20.55% | +0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.42% | 12.09% | +12.33% |
Volatility
CE vs. ALB - Volatility Comparison
Celanese Corporation (CE) has a higher volatility of 21.32% compared to Albemarle Corporation (ALB) at 16.32%. This indicates that CE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CE | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.32% | 16.32% | +5.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.02% | 43.64% | -2.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.73% | 64.79% | -1.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.12% | 53.87% | -9.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.60% | 47.65% | -9.05% |
Financials
CE vs. ALB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celanese Corporation and Albemarle Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CE vs. ALB - Profitability Comparison
CE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celanese Corporation reported a gross profit of 383.00M and revenue of 2.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.4%.
ALB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Albemarle Corporation reported a gross profit of 197.93M and revenue of 1.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.9%.
CE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celanese Corporation reported an operating income of 128.00M and revenue of 2.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.8%.
ALB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Albemarle Corporation reported an operating income of -217.39M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in an operating margin of -15.2%.
CE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celanese Corporation reported a net income of 19.00M and revenue of 2.20B, resulting in a net margin of 0.9%.
ALB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Albemarle Corporation reported a net income of -455.87M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in a net margin of -31.9%.