PortfoliosLab logo
CE vs. ALB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CE and ALB is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CE vs. ALB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Celanese Corporation (CE) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CE:

-1.07

ALB:

-0.89

Sortino Ratio

CE:

-1.78

ALB:

-1.36

Omega Ratio

CE:

0.72

ALB:

0.84

Calmar Ratio

CE:

-0.85

ALB:

-0.62

Martin Ratio

CE:

-1.45

ALB:

-1.47

Ulcer Index

CE:

45.62%

ALB:

35.41%

Daily Std Dev

CE:

60.61%

ALB:

58.34%

Max Drawdown

CE:

-84.87%

ALB:

-83.90%

Current Drawdown

CE:

-67.75%

ALB:

-80.48%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CE:

$5.60B

ALB:

$6.82B

EPS

CE:

-$15.12

ALB:

-$11.12

PEG Ratio

CE:

1.71

ALB:

0.99

PS Ratio

CE:

0.56

ALB:

1.34

PB Ratio

CE:

1.08

ALB:

0.87

Total Revenue (TTM)

CE:

$10.06B

ALB:

$5.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CE:

$2.25B

ALB:

$179.90M

EBITDA (TTM)

CE:

$90.00M

ALB:

-$811.95M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CE achieves a -21.11% return, which is significantly higher than ALB's -28.07% return. Over the past 10 years, CE has underperformed ALB with an annualized return of -0.05%, while ALB has yielded a comparatively higher 0.96% annualized return.


CE

YTD

-21.11%

1M

42.18%

6M

-30.55%

1Y

-64.78%

5Y*

-4.05%

10Y*

-0.05%

ALB

YTD

-28.07%

1M

8.65%

6M

-43.74%

1Y

-51.65%

5Y*

1.67%

10Y*

0.96%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CE vs. ALB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CE is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CE is 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CE is 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CE is 22
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CE is 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CE is 88
Martin Ratio Rank

ALB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ALB is 88
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ALB is 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ALB is 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ALB is 99
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ALB is 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ALB is 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CE vs. ALB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celanese Corporation (CE) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CE Sharpe Ratio is -1.07, which is comparable to the ALB Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CE and ALB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CE vs. ALB - Dividend Comparison

CE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than ALB's 2.62% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CE
Celanese Corporation
2.68%4.05%1.80%2.68%1.62%1.91%1.95%2.31%1.62%1.75%1.71%1.55%
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
2.62%1.87%1.11%0.73%0.67%1.04%2.02%1.74%1.00%1.42%2.07%1.83%

Drawdowns

CE vs. ALB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CE drawdown since its inception was -84.87%, roughly equal to the maximum ALB drawdown of -83.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CE and ALB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CE vs. ALB - Volatility Comparison

Celanese Corporation (CE) has a higher volatility of 15.88% compared to Albemarle Corporation (ALB) at 13.09%. This indicates that CE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CE vs. ALB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celanese Corporation and Albemarle Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20212022202320242025
2.39B
1.08B
(CE) Total Revenue
(ALB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CE vs. ALB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Celanese Corporation and Albemarle Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%20212022202320242025
19.9%
14.5%
(CE) Gross Margin
(ALB) Gross Margin
CE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Celanese Corporation reported a gross profit of 476.00M and revenue of 2.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.9%.

ALB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Albemarle Corporation reported a gross profit of 156.30M and revenue of 1.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.5%.

CE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Celanese Corporation reported an operating income of 168.00M and revenue of 2.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.

ALB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Albemarle Corporation reported an operating income of 19.76M and revenue of 1.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.8%.

CE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Celanese Corporation reported a net income of -21.00M and revenue of 2.39B, resulting in a net margin of -0.9%.

ALB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Albemarle Corporation reported a net income of 41.35M and revenue of 1.08B, resulting in a net margin of 3.8%.