PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CE vs. ALB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CEALB
YTD Return-51.46%-28.52%
1Y Return-40.75%-18.91%
3Y Return (Ann)-22.19%-27.18%
5Y Return (Ann)-8.12%10.35%
10Y Return (Ann)4.32%6.69%
Sharpe Ratio-1.04-0.29
Sortino Ratio-1.26-0.04
Omega Ratio0.791.00
Calmar Ratio-0.71-0.22
Martin Ratio-2.26-0.60
Ulcer Index17.74%28.71%
Daily Std Dev38.66%59.10%
Max Drawdown-84.87%-77.22%
Current Drawdown-56.32%-67.93%

Fundamentals


CEALB
Market Cap$8.27B$12.08B
EPS$17.67-$16.76
PEG Ratio4.421.22
Total Revenue (TTM)$10.48B$6.50B
Gross Profit (TTM)$2.36B$689.47M
EBITDA (TTM)$1.47B-$1.93B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between CE and ALB is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CE vs. ALB - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CE achieves a -51.46% return, which is significantly lower than ALB's -28.52% return. Over the past 10 years, CE has underperformed ALB with an annualized return of 4.32%, while ALB has yielded a comparatively higher 6.69% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-52.00%
-20.31%
CE
ALB

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CE vs. ALB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celanese Corporation (CE) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CE
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CE, currently valued at -1.04, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-1.04
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CE, currently valued at -1.26, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-1.26
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CE, currently valued at 0.79, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.79
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CE, currently valued at -0.71, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.71
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CE, currently valued at -2.26, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-2.26
ALB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ALB, currently valued at -0.29, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.29
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ALB, currently valued at -0.04, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.04
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ALB, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.00
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ALB, currently valued at -0.22, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.22
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ALB, currently valued at -0.60, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.60

CE vs. ALB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CE Sharpe Ratio is -1.04, which is lower than the ALB Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CE and ALB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.50-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.04
-0.29
CE
ALB

Dividends

CE vs. ALB - Dividend Comparison

CE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, more than ALB's 1.57% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CE
Celanese Corporation
3.79%1.80%2.68%1.62%1.91%1.95%2.31%1.62%1.75%1.71%1.55%0.95%
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
1.57%1.11%0.73%0.67%1.04%2.02%1.74%1.00%1.42%2.07%1.83%1.51%

Drawdowns

CE vs. ALB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CE drawdown since its inception was -84.87%, which is greater than ALB's maximum drawdown of -77.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CE and ALB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-56.32%
-67.93%
CE
ALB

Volatility

CE vs. ALB - Volatility Comparison

Celanese Corporation (CE) has a higher volatility of 30.81% compared to Albemarle Corporation (ALB) at 17.74%. This indicates that CE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
30.81%
17.74%
CE
ALB

Financials

CE vs. ALB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celanese Corporation and Albemarle Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items