PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CE vs. ALB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CE and ALB is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

CE vs. ALB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Celanese Corporation (CE) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-47.15%
6.77%
CE
ALB

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CE:

-1.21

ALB:

-0.31

Sortino Ratio

CE:

-1.64

ALB:

-0.08

Omega Ratio

CE:

0.74

ALB:

0.99

Calmar Ratio

CE:

-0.78

ALB:

-0.23

Martin Ratio

CE:

-1.62

ALB:

-0.66

Ulcer Index

CE:

29.66%

ALB:

27.23%

Daily Std Dev

CE:

39.70%

ALB:

57.65%

Max Drawdown

CE:

-84.87%

ALB:

-77.22%

Current Drawdown

CE:

-57.11%

ALB:

-69.26%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CE:

$7.94B

ALB:

$11.46B

EPS

CE:

$10.14

ALB:

-$17.32

PEG Ratio

CE:

4.42

ALB:

8.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

CE:

$7.91B

ALB:

$4.15B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CE:

$1.75B

ALB:

-$78.57M

EBITDA (TTM)

CE:

$1.65B

ALB:

-$1.29B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CE achieves a 4.91% return, which is significantly lower than ALB's 13.26% return. Over the past 10 years, CE has underperformed ALB with an annualized return of 4.74%, while ALB has yielded a comparatively higher 6.86% annualized return.


CE

YTD

4.91%

1M

6.87%

6M

-47.15%

1Y

-49.13%

5Y*

-7.18%

10Y*

4.74%

ALB

YTD

13.26%

1M

7.68%

6M

6.77%

1Y

-16.09%

5Y*

4.97%

10Y*

6.86%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CE vs. ALB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CE is 33
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CE is 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CE is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CE is 33
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CE is 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CE is 33
Martin Ratio Rank

ALB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ALB is 3232
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ALB is 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ALB is 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ALB is 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ALB is 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ALB is 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CE vs. ALB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celanese Corporation (CE) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CE, currently valued at -1.21, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.00-1.21-0.31
The chart of Sortino ratio for CE, currently valued at -1.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-1.64-0.08
The chart of Omega ratio for CE, currently valued at 0.74, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.740.99
The chart of Calmar ratio for CE, currently valued at -0.78, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.78-0.23
The chart of Martin ratio for CE, currently valued at -1.62, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-1.62-0.66
CE
ALB

The current CE Sharpe Ratio is -1.21, which is lower than the ALB Sharpe Ratio of -0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CE and ALB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.50-1.00-0.500.000.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-1.21
-0.31
CE
ALB

Dividends

CE vs. ALB - Dividend Comparison

CE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, more than ALB's 1.65% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CE
Celanese Corporation
3.86%4.05%1.80%2.68%1.62%1.91%1.95%2.31%1.62%1.75%1.71%1.55%
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
1.65%1.87%1.11%0.73%0.67%1.04%2.02%1.74%1.00%1.42%2.07%1.83%

Drawdowns

CE vs. ALB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CE drawdown since its inception was -84.87%, which is greater than ALB's maximum drawdown of -77.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CE and ALB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-57.11%
-69.26%
CE
ALB

Volatility

CE vs. ALB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Celanese Corporation (CE) is 8.66%, while Albemarle Corporation (ALB) has a volatility of 12.56%. This indicates that CE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
8.66%
12.56%
CE
ALB

Financials

CE vs. ALB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celanese Corporation and Albemarle Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab