CDL vs. UDIV
CDL (VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF) and UDIV (Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) are both Dividend funds - CDL tracks the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index while UDIV tracks the Linked Morningstar US Dividend Enhanced Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CDL returned 11.17%/yr vs 11.54%/yr for UDIV. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CDL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for UDIV.
Performance
CDL vs. UDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDL achieves a 17.17% return, which is significantly higher than UDIV's 13.87% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CDL having a 11.17% annualized return and UDIV not far ahead at 11.54%.
CDL
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 10.38%
- YTD
- 17.17%
- 1Y
- 22.30%
- 3Y*
- 14.61%
- 5Y*
- 10.44%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.29%
UDIV
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 11.30%
- YTD
- 13.87%
- 1Y
- 25.58%
- 3Y*
- 21.43%
- 5Y*
- 13.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $504.48K | $625.50K | $553.90K | |
| $516.03K | $427.19K | $922.08K |
CDL vs. UDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDL VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 17.17% | 9.04% | 15.58% | 3.03% | -0.45% | 33.42% | -3.35% | 26.38% | -5.86% | 16.29% |
UDIV Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 13.87% | 19.00% | 25.61% | 25.21% | -15.00% | 19.66% | 5.54% | 24.60% | -8.83% | 17.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDL and UDIV is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2016 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CDL and UDIV has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
CDL vs. UDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CDL
UDIV
Utilities
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
CDL
UDIV
Financial Services
CDL
UDIV
Consumer Defensive
CDL
UDIV
Energy
CDL
UDIV
Healthcare
CDL
UDIV
Consumer Cyclical
CDL
UDIV
Technology
CDL
UDIV
Communication Services
CDL
UDIV
Industrials
CDL
UDIV
Basic Materials
CDL
UDIV
Real Estate
CDL
UDIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDL vs. UDIV — Risk / Return Rank
CDL
UDIV
CDL vs. UDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) and Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CDL | UDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.33 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.87 | 2.82 | +1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.78 | 11.60 | +2.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CDL vs. UDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDL drawdown since its inception was -41.03%, which is greater than UDIV's maximum drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDL and UDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDL | UDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.03% | -35.21% | -5.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.66% | -8.44% | +2.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.87% | -19.19% | +6.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.28% | -23.18% | +5.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.03% | -35.21% | -5.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.35% | -1.66% | -0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.29% | -4.60% | +0.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 2.05% | -0.46% |
Volatility
CDL vs. UDIV - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) at 3.90%. This indicates that CDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDL | UDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.20% | 3.90% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.85% | 10.26% | -2.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.34% | 13.02% | -2.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.88% | 15.66% | -1.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 16.17% | +0.87% |
CDL vs. UDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CDL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than UDIV's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
CDL vs. UDIV - Dividend Comparison
CDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, more than UDIV's 1.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDL VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.06% | 3.33% | 3.27% | 3.61% | 3.31% | 2.60% | 3.32% | 3.04% | 3.32% | 2.87% | 2.97% | 1.28% |
UDIV Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 1.48% | 1.53% | 2.05% | 1.91% | 3.20% | 2.97% | 2.90% | 3.40% | 3.74% | 3.47% | 1.63% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CDL and UDIV have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CDL has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to UDIV (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDL dropped -41.03% vs UDIV's -35.21%.
On 10-year performance, UDIV leads with 11.54% vs 11.17% for CDL. On fees, UDIV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, UDIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UDIV has performed better with a 11.54% return vs 11.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UDIV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CDL.
CDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 1.48% for UDIV.
CDL tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index, while UDIV tracks Linked Morningstar US Dividend Enhanced Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CDL and 0.06% for UDIV.
CDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CDL and UDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer