PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDL vs. DHS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDL vs. DHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CDL having a 11.10% return and DHS slightly lower at 10.63%. Over the past 10 years, CDL has outperformed DHS with an annualized return of 10.90%, while DHS has yielded a comparatively lower 9.55% annualized return.


CDL

1D
0.62%
1M
-0.81%
YTD
11.10%
6M
11.64%
1Y
19.30%
3Y*
14.91%
5Y*
8.87%
10Y*
10.90%

DHS

1D
0.75%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
10.63%
6M
11.97%
1Y
21.74%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
10.82%
10Y*
9.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDL vs. DHS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDL
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
11.10%9.04%15.58%3.03%-0.45%33.42%-3.35%26.38%-5.86%16.29%
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
10.63%12.87%18.02%-0.19%7.97%23.20%-5.70%22.59%-7.41%11.69%

Correlation

The correlation between CDL and DHS is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2015

0.90

The correlation between CDL and DHS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

CDL vs. DHS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CDL
DHS

Utilities

24.3%
9.0%

Financial Services

23.4%
22.3%

Consumer Defensive

15.9%
18.7%

Energy

9.5%
9.4%

Technology

6.9%
3.7%

Healthcare

6.8%
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
5.0%

Communication Services

4.4%
9.3%

Industrials

2.3%
4.1%

Basic Materials

0.0%
1.2%

Real Estate

0.0%
2.8%

Utilities

CDL
24.3%
DHS
9.0%

Financial Services

CDL
23.4%
DHS
22.3%

Consumer Defensive

CDL
15.9%
DHS
18.7%

Energy

CDL
9.5%
DHS
9.4%

Technology

CDL
6.9%
DHS
3.7%

Healthcare

CDL
6.8%
DHS
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

CDL
6.6%
DHS
5.0%

Communication Services

CDL
4.4%
DHS
9.3%

Industrials

CDL
2.3%
DHS
4.1%

Basic Materials

CDL
0.0%
DHS
1.2%

Real Estate

CDL
0.0%
DHS
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDL vs. DHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDL
CDL Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
CDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDL Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

DHS
DHS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
DHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHS Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDL vs. DHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CDLDHSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.99

2.19

-0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.95

3.27

-0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.38

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

3.47

-0.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.20

12.82

-0.62

CDL vs. DHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDL Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the DHS Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDL and DHS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CDLDHSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

2.19

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.78

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.60

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.41

+0.24

Drawdowns

CDL vs. DHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDL drawdown since its inception was -41.03%, smaller than the maximum DHS drawdown of -67.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDL and DHS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDLDHSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.03%

-67.25%

+26.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.66%

-6.30%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.87%

-11.87%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.28%

-15.28%

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.03%

-37.35%

-3.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

-1.94%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

-9.55%

+5.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.70%

-0.11%

Volatility

CDL vs. DHS - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) have volatilities of 2.80% and 2.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDLDHSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

2.88%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.90%

7.31%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.73%

9.98%

-0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.85%

13.88%

-0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.04%

16.08%

+0.96%

CDL vs. DHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DHS's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

CDL vs. DHS - Dividend Comparison

CDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, less than DHS's 3.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDL
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.15%3.33%3.27%3.61%3.31%2.60%3.32%3.04%3.32%2.87%2.97%1.28%
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
3.33%3.32%3.66%4.31%3.42%3.29%4.14%3.69%3.76%3.00%3.25%3.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, CDL and DHS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DHS has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to CDL (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDL dropped -41.03% vs DHS's -67.25%.

On 10-year performance, CDL leads with 10.90% vs 9.55% for DHS. On fees, CDL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CDL has performed better with a 10.90% return vs 9.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CDL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DHS.

DHS has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 3.15% for CDL.

CDL tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index, while DHS tracks WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CDL and 0.38% for DHS.

DHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDL and DHS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer