PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDL vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDL vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDL achieves a 11.10% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return. Over the past 10 years, CDL has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 10.90%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.77% annualized return.


CDL

1D
0.62%
1M
-0.81%
YTD
11.10%
6M
11.64%
1Y
19.30%
3Y*
14.91%
5Y*
8.87%
10Y*
10.90%

SCHD

1D
0.59%
1M
1.60%
YTD
19.01%
6M
20.36%
1Y
28.08%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDL vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDL
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
11.10%9.04%15.58%3.03%-0.45%33.42%-3.35%26.38%-5.86%16.29%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
19.01%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between CDL and SCHD is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2015

0.88

The correlation between CDL and SCHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

CDL vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CDL
SCHD

Utilities

24.3%
0.0%

Financial Services

23.4%
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

15.9%
19.2%

Energy

9.5%
16.2%

Technology

6.9%
16.4%

Healthcare

6.8%
18.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
6.3%

Communication Services

4.4%
6.3%

Industrials

2.3%
7.5%

Basic Materials

0.0%
1.2%

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Utilities

CDL
24.3%
SCHD
0.0%

Financial Services

CDL
23.4%
SCHD
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

CDL
15.9%
SCHD
19.2%

Energy

CDL
9.5%
SCHD
16.2%

Technology

CDL
6.9%
SCHD
16.4%

Healthcare

CDL
6.8%
SCHD
18.8%

Consumer Cyclical

CDL
6.6%
SCHD
6.3%

Communication Services

CDL
4.4%
SCHD
6.3%

Industrials

CDL
2.3%
SCHD
7.5%

Basic Materials

CDL
0.0%
SCHD
1.2%

Real Estate

CDL
0.0%
SCHD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDL vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDL
CDL Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
CDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDL Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDL vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CDLSCHDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.99

2.57

-0.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.95

3.98

-1.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.46

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

6.17

-2.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.20

15.20

-3.01

CDL vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDL Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDL and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CDLSCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

2.57

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.59

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.77

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.86

-0.21

Drawdowns

CDL vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDL drawdown since its inception was -41.03%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDL and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDLSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.03%

-33.37%

-7.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.66%

-4.61%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.87%

-16.13%

+3.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.28%

-16.85%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.03%

-33.37%

-7.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

-1.40%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

-3.32%

-1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.87%

-0.28%

Volatility

CDL vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) have volatilities of 2.80% and 2.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDLSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

2.92%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.90%

7.66%

-0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.73%

10.96%

-1.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.85%

14.38%

-0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.04%

16.72%

+0.32%

CDL vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

CDL vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

CDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, less than SCHD's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDL
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.15%3.33%3.27%3.61%3.31%2.60%3.32%3.04%3.32%2.87%2.97%1.28%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.26%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


CDL and SCHD have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHD has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to CDL (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDL dropped -41.03% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.77% vs 10.90% for CDL. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, CDL has been the lower-risk option at 2.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.77% return vs 10.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CDL.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 3.15% for CDL.

CDL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. CDL tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CDL and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDL and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer