PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDL vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDL vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDL achieves a 17.17% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 18.16% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CDL having a 11.17% annualized return and FDL not far behind at 11.09%.


CDL

1D
-0.51%
1M
0.29%
6M
10.38%
YTD
17.17%
1Y
22.30%
3Y*
14.61%
5Y*
10.44%
10Y*
11.17%
ALL TIME*
11.29%

FDL

1D
0.02%
1M
3.27%
6M
9.50%
YTD
18.16%
1Y
27.65%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*
11.09%
ALL TIME*
8.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$504.48K$625.50K$553.90K
$52.24M$50.06M$42.95M

CDL vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDL
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
17.17%9.04%15.58%3.03%-0.45%33.42%-3.35%26.38%-5.86%16.29%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
18.16%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between CDL and FDL is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2015

0.88

The correlation between CDL and FDL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

CDL vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CDL
FDL

Utilities

24.3%
15.4%

Financial Services

24.1%
13.7%

Consumer Defensive

15.7%
24.3%

Energy

8.6%
11.1%

Healthcare

7.2%
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%
4.4%

Technology

6.9%
4.3%

Communication Services

3.9%
11.2%

Industrials

2.3%
3.6%

Basic Materials

0.0%
0.4%

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Utilities

CDL
24.3%
FDL
15.4%

Financial Services

CDL
24.1%
FDL
13.7%

Consumer Defensive

CDL
15.7%
FDL
24.3%

Energy

CDL
8.6%
FDL
11.1%

Healthcare

CDL
7.2%
FDL
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

CDL
7.0%
FDL
4.4%

Technology

CDL
6.9%
FDL
4.3%

Communication Services

CDL
3.9%
FDL
11.2%

Industrials

CDL
2.3%
FDL
3.6%

Basic Materials

CDL
0.0%
FDL
0.4%

Real Estate

CDL
0.0%
FDL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDL vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CDL
CDL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
CDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
CDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDL Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CDL vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CDLFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.39

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.87

6.29

-2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.78

14.86

-1.08

CDL vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDL Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDL and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CDL vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDL drawdown since its inception was -41.03%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDL and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDLFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.03%

-65.93%

+24.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.66%

-4.27%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.87%

-12.24%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.28%

-16.46%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.03%

-41.40%

+0.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.35%

-1.96%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-9.59%

+5.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.81%

-0.22%

Volatility

CDL vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) is 4.20%, while First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a volatility of 4.96%. This indicates that CDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDLFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

4.96%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.85%

8.97%

-1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.34%

11.95%

-1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.88%

14.44%

-0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.04%

17.16%

-0.12%

CDL vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

CDL vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

CDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, less than FDL's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDL
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.06%3.33%3.27%3.61%3.31%2.60%3.32%3.04%3.32%2.87%2.97%1.28%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.59%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


CDL and FDL have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDL has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to CDL (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDL dropped -41.03% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 10-year performance, CDL leads with 11.17% vs 11.09% for FDL. On fees, CDL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CDL has been the lower-risk option at 4.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CDL has performed better with a 11.17% return vs 11.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CDL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FDL.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 3.06% for CDL.

CDL is categorized as Dividend, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. CDL tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CDL and 0.43% for FDL.

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDL and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer