CCJ vs. GFI
CCJ (Cameco Corporation) and GFI (Gold Fields Limited) are both stocks. CCJ operates in Uranium (Energy), while GFI operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, CCJ returned 25.85%/yr vs 26.67%/yr for GFI. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CCJ vs. GFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCJ achieves a 15.25% return, which is significantly higher than GFI's -15.43% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CCJ having a 25.85% annualized return and GFI not far ahead at 26.67%.
CCJ
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- -9.69%
- YTD
- 15.25%
- 6M
- 16.00%
- 1Y
- 74.85%
- 3Y*
- 51.07%
- 5Y*
- 37.97%
- 10Y*
- 25.85%
GFI
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- -20.02%
- YTD
- -15.43%
- 6M
- -10.31%
- 1Y
- 51.45%
- 3Y*
- 36.70%
- 5Y*
- 31.29%
- 10Y*
- 26.67%
CCJ vs. GFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 15.25% | 78.38% | 19.47% | 90.49% | 4.35% | 63.19% | 51.47% | -21.08% | 23.58% | -8.20% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | -15.43% | 240.42% | -6.27% | 44.90% | -2.61% | 23.33% | 43.02% | 89.47% | -16.75% | 45.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCJ and GFI is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2007 | 0.24 |
The correlation between CCJ and GFI shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (10 years) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CCJ:
$45.93B
GFI:
$32.09B
CCJ:
$1.49
GFI:
$5.39
CCJ:
70.56
GFI:
6.66
CCJ:
0.59
GFI:
0.11
CCJ:
12.97
GFI:
2.30
CCJ:
6.49
GFI:
3.81
CCJ:
$3.54B
GFI:
$13.98B
CCJ:
$1.04B
GFI:
$7.34B
CCJ:
$996.66M
GFI:
$8.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCJ vs. GFI — Risk / Return Rank
CCJ
GFI
CCJ vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCJ | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.19 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 1.29 | +1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.51 | 3.29 | +3.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCJ | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 0.87 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.60 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.49 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.12 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
CCJ vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCJ drawdown since its inception was -87.53%, roughly equal to the maximum GFI drawdown of -88.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCJ and GFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCJ | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.53% | -88.05% | +0.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.69% | -39.97% | +14.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.01% | -39.97% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.01% | -56.22% | +16.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.22% | -63.09% | +5.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.37% | -39.97% | +18.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.09% | -44.26% | -1.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.54% | 15.69% | -4.15% |
Volatility
CCJ vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison
Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI) have volatilities of 15.98% and 15.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCJ | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.98% | 15.34% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.04% | 45.82% | -6.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.87% | 59.39% | -3.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.87% | 52.26% | -2.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.69% | 54.86% | -8.17% |
Dividends
CCJ vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison
CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than GFI's 5.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.22% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.53% | 4.33% | 3.82% | 3.24% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 5.13% | 1.77% | 2.94% | 2.87% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 1.41% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
Financials
CCJ vs. GFI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cameco Corporation and Gold Fields Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CCJ vs. GFI - Profitability Comparison
CCJ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a gross profit of 291.00M and revenue of 847.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.3%.
GFI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.
CCJ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported an operating income of 154.28M and revenue of 847.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.
GFI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.
CCJ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a net income of 131.09M and revenue of 847.55M, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.
GFI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CCJ and GFI have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CCJ has higher volatility (15.98%) compared to GFI (15.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCJ dropped -87.53% vs GFI's -88.05%.
CCJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCJ and GFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer