PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GFI vs. FSAGX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GFI and FSAGX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

GFI vs. FSAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
65.05%
13.47%
GFI
FSAGX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GFI:

0.56

FSAGX:

1.31

Sortino Ratio

GFI:

1.00

FSAGX:

1.84

Omega Ratio

GFI:

1.13

FSAGX:

1.23

Calmar Ratio

GFI:

0.84

FSAGX:

0.58

Martin Ratio

GFI:

1.62

FSAGX:

4.79

Ulcer Index

GFI:

15.78%

FSAGX:

7.65%

Daily Std Dev

GFI:

46.00%

FSAGX:

27.91%

Max Drawdown

GFI:

-86.06%

FSAGX:

-77.21%

Current Drawdown

GFI:

-19.14%

FSAGX:

-46.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFI achieves a 15.83% return, which is significantly higher than FSAGX's 7.08% return. Over the past 10 years, GFI has outperformed FSAGX with an annualized return of 12.76%, while FSAGX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.01% annualized return.


GFI

YTD

15.83%

1M

12.59%

6M

-6.82%

1Y

24.12%

5Y*

23.83%

10Y*

12.76%

FSAGX

YTD

7.08%

1M

7.59%

6M

3.90%

1Y

36.54%

5Y*

4.29%

10Y*

4.01%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GFI vs. FSAGX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GFI is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GFI is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GFI is 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GFI is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GFI is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GFI is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

FSAGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSAGX is 5656
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSAGX is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSAGX is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSAGX is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSAGX is 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSAGX is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GFI vs. FSAGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GFI, currently valued at 0.56, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.561.31
The chart of Sortino ratio for GFI, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.001.84
The chart of Omega ratio for GFI, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.131.23
The chart of Calmar ratio for GFI, currently valued at 0.84, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.840.58
The chart of Martin ratio for GFI, currently valued at 1.62, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.624.79
GFI
FSAGX

The current GFI Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the FSAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFI and FSAGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.56
1.31
GFI
FSAGX

Dividends

GFI vs. FSAGX - Dividend Comparison

GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than FSAGX's 3.39% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GFI
Gold Fields Limited
2.54%2.94%2.86%3.40%3.24%1.73%0.80%1.62%1.77%1.69%0.72%0.86%
FSAGX
Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio
3.39%3.62%0.99%0.36%1.59%4.40%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GFI vs. FSAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFI drawdown since its inception was -86.06%, which is greater than FSAGX's maximum drawdown of -77.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFI and FSAGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-19.14%
-46.09%
GFI
FSAGX

Volatility

GFI vs. FSAGX - Volatility Comparison

Gold Fields Limited (GFI) has a higher volatility of 9.67% compared to Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) at 7.60%. This indicates that GFI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
9.67%
7.60%
GFI
FSAGX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab