PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCJ vs. UUUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

CCJ vs. UUUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CCJ vs. UUUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
21.47%78.38%19.47%90.49%4.35%63.19%51.47%-21.08%23.58%-8.20%
UUUU
Energy Fuels Inc.
23.45%183.43%-28.65%15.78%-18.61%79.11%123.04%-32.98%59.22%9.15%

Fundamentals

EPS

CCJ:

$1.35

UUUU:

-$0.43

PS Ratio

CCJ:

13.90

UUUU:

51.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

CCJ:

$3.48B

UUUU:

$78.74M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CCJ:

$1.02B

UUUU:

-$4.06M

EBITDA (TTM)

CCJ:

$1.05B

UUUU:

-$90.66M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCJ achieves a 21.47% return, which is significantly lower than UUUU's 23.45% return. Over the past 10 years, CCJ has outperformed UUUU with an annualized return of 25.49%, while UUUU has yielded a comparatively lower 22.86% annualized return.


CCJ

1D
2.32%
1M
-11.62%
YTD
21.47%
6M
33.36%
1Y
166.38%
3Y*
62.25%
5Y*
45.51%
10Y*
25.49%

UUUU

1D
-1.64%
1M
-23.19%
YTD
23.45%
6M
14.26%
1Y
389.10%
3Y*
47.62%
5Y*
24.59%
10Y*
22.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCJ vs. UUUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCJ
CCJ Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CCJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CCJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

UUUU
UUUU Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
UUUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUUU Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
UUUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUUU Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCJ vs. UUUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCJUUUUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.07

4.13

-1.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.58

3.58

+0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.44

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.64

7.43

-0.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.53

17.03

+0.50

CCJ vs. UUUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCJ Sharpe Ratio is 3.07, which is comparable to the UUUU Sharpe Ratio of 4.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCJ and UUUU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCJUUUUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07

4.13

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.34

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.32

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

-0.14

+0.37

Correlation

The correlation between CCJ and UUUU is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CCJ vs. UUUU - Dividend Comparison

CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, while UUUU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
0.15%0.19%0.22%0.20%0.39%0.29%0.46%0.67%0.53%4.33%3.82%3.24%
UUUU
Energy Fuels Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CCJ vs. UUUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCJ drawdown since its inception was -87.53%, smaller than the maximum UUUU drawdown of -99.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCJ and UUUU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CCJUUUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.53%

-99.64%

+12.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.69%

-51.28%

+25.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.01%

-68.70%

+28.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.22%

-79.31%

+22.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.12%

-92.36%

+75.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.28%

-92.66%

+46.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.73%

22.38%

-12.65%

Volatility

CCJ vs. UUUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cameco Corporation (CCJ) is 16.63%, while Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) has a volatility of 22.68%. This indicates that CCJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UUUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CCJUUUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.63%

22.68%

-6.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.74%

71.79%

-30.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.63%

94.90%

-40.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.69%

73.14%

-23.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.28%

72.03%

-25.75%

Financials

CCJ vs. UUUU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cameco Corporation and Energy Fuels Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
1.20B
17.71M
(CCJ) Total Revenue
(UUUU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items