CCJ vs. UEC
CCJ (Cameco Corporation) and UEC (Uranium Energy Corp.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Uranium industry within the Energy sector. Over the past 10 years, CCJ returned 27.01%/yr vs 29.57%/yr for UEC. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CCJ vs. UEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCJ achieves a 17.03% return, which is significantly higher than UEC's -1.80% return. Over the past 10 years, CCJ has underperformed UEC with an annualized return of 27.01%, while UEC has yielded a comparatively higher 29.57% annualized return.
CCJ
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- 17.03%
- 6M
- 16.75%
- 1Y
- 57.14%
- 3Y*
- 53.29%
- 5Y*
- 40.64%
- 10Y*
- 27.01%
UEC
- 1D
- -4.50%
- 1M
- -11.90%
- YTD
- -1.80%
- 6M
- -8.09%
- 1Y
- 77.55%
- 3Y*
- 49.83%
- 5Y*
- 32.49%
- 10Y*
- 29.57%
CCJ vs. UEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 17.03% | 78.38% | 19.47% | 90.49% | 4.35% | 63.19% | 51.47% | -21.08% | 23.58% | -8.20% |
UEC Uranium Energy Corp. | -1.80% | 74.59% | 4.53% | 64.95% | 15.82% | 90.34% | 91.47% | -26.46% | -29.38% | 58.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCJ and UEC is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2007 | 0.49 |
Over the past year, CCJ and UEC have become more correlated (0.75) than their long-term average of 0.49, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
CCJ:
$46.64B
UEC:
$5.63B
CCJ:
CA$1.49
UEC:
-$0.22
CCJ:
18.67
UEC:
268.07
CCJ:
9.33
UEC:
3.96
CCJ:
CA$3.54B
UEC:
$20.20M
CCJ:
CA$1.04B
UEC:
-$18.26M
CCJ:
CA$996.66M
UEC:
-$114.96M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCJ vs. UEC — Risk / Return Rank
CCJ
UEC
CCJ vs. UEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCJ | UEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.20 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 1.46 | +0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.65 | 3.47 | +1.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCJ vs. UEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCJ drawdown since its inception was -87.53%, smaller than the maximum UEC drawdown of -97.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCJ and UEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCJ | UEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.53% | -97.40% | +9.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.13% | -53.23% | +24.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.01% | -53.49% | +13.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.01% | -63.76% | +23.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.22% | -80.59% | +23.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.15% | -43.05% | +22.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.06% | -62.06% | +16.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.33% | 22.41% | -10.08% |
Volatility
CCJ vs. UEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cameco Corporation (CCJ) is 18.28%, while Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) has a volatility of 33.70%. This indicates that CCJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCJ | UEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.28% | 33.70% | -15.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.80% | 60.40% | -20.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.45% | 79.63% | -24.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.78% | 74.84% | -25.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.81% | 73.95% | -27.14% |
Dividends
CCJ vs. UEC - Dividend Comparison
CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, while UEC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.22% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.53% | 4.33% | 3.82% | 3.24% |
UEC Uranium Energy Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CCJ vs. UEC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cameco Corporation and Uranium Energy Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CCJ and UEC have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UEC has higher volatility (33.70%) compared to CCJ (18.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCJ dropped -87.53% vs UEC's -97.40%.
CCJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCJ and UEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer