CCJ vs. UEC

In the year-to-date period, CCJ achieves a -14.40% return, which is significantly higher than UEC's -21.23% return. Over the past 10 years, CCJ has outperformed UEC with an annualized return of 10.86%, while UEC has yielded a comparatively lower 6.93% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CCJ Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is higher than the UEC Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCJ and UEC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, while UEC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum CCJ drawdown since its inception was -87.86%, smaller than the maximum UEC drawdown of -97.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCJ and UEC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Cameco Corporation (CCJ) is 16.91%, while Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) has a volatility of 20.49%. This indicates that CCJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cameco Corporation and Uranium Energy Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.