PortfoliosLab logo
CCJ vs. UEC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CCJ and UEC is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CCJ vs. UEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CCJ:

0.07

UEC:

-0.37

Sortino Ratio

CCJ:

0.41

UEC:

-0.13

Omega Ratio

CCJ:

1.05

UEC:

0.99

Calmar Ratio

CCJ:

0.07

UEC:

-0.44

Martin Ratio

CCJ:

0.14

UEC:

-0.89

Ulcer Index

CCJ:

20.05%

UEC:

26.63%

Daily Std Dev

CCJ:

47.62%

UEC:

65.87%

Max Drawdown

CCJ:

-87.86%

UEC:

-97.40%

Current Drawdown

CCJ:

-16.14%

UEC:

-38.49%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CCJ:

$23.27B

UEC:

$2.41B

EPS

CCJ:

$0.40

UEC:

-$0.15

PEG Ratio

CCJ:

3.33

UEC:

0.00

PS Ratio

CCJ:

7.07

UEC:

36.05

PB Ratio

CCJ:

5.00

UEC:

2.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

CCJ:

$3.29B

UEC:

$66.84M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CCJ:

$961.04M

UEC:

$13.54M

EBITDA (TTM)

CCJ:

$800.16M

UEC:

-$47.31M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCJ achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly higher than UEC's -20.93% return. Over the past 10 years, CCJ has outperformed UEC with an annualized return of 13.47%, while UEC has yielded a comparatively lower 7.30% annualized return.


CCJ

YTD

-0.23%

1M

24.20%

6M

-4.14%

1Y

3.09%

5Y*

39.68%

10Y*

13.47%

UEC

YTD

-20.93%

1M

9.75%

6M

-28.71%

1Y

-24.21%

5Y*

38.55%

10Y*

7.30%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CCJ vs. UEC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCJ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CCJ is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CCJ is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CCJ is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CCJ is 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CCJ is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CCJ is 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

UEC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UEC is 2929
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UEC is 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UEC is 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UEC is 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UEC is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UEC is 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CCJ vs. UEC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CCJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is higher than the UEC Sharpe Ratio of -0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCJ and UEC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CCJ vs. UEC - Dividend Comparison

CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, while UEC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
0.22%0.22%0.20%0.39%0.29%0.46%0.67%0.53%3.36%2.88%2.50%2.19%
UEC
Uranium Energy Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CCJ vs. UEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCJ drawdown since its inception was -87.86%, smaller than the maximum UEC drawdown of -97.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCJ and UEC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CCJ vs. UEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cameco Corporation (CCJ) is 10.78%, while Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) has a volatility of 15.63%. This indicates that CCJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CCJ vs. UEC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cameco Corporation and Uranium Energy Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20212022202320242025
789.43M
49.75M
(CCJ) Total Revenue
(UEC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CCJ vs. UEC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cameco Corporation and Uranium Energy Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
34.2%
36.6%
(CCJ) Gross Margin
(UEC) Gross Margin
CCJ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cameco Corporation reported a gross profit of 270.14M and revenue of 789.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.2%.

UEC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Uranium Energy Corp. reported a gross profit of 18.23M and revenue of 49.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.6%.

CCJ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cameco Corporation reported an operating income of 185.81M and revenue of 789.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.5%.

UEC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Uranium Energy Corp. reported an operating income of -3.63M and revenue of 49.75M, resulting in an operating margin of -7.3%.

CCJ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cameco Corporation reported a net income of 69.76M and revenue of 789.43M, resulting in a net margin of 8.8%.

UEC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Uranium Energy Corp. reported a net income of -10.23M and revenue of 49.75M, resulting in a net margin of -20.6%.